From: Pierre Ossman <pierre-list@ossman.eu>
To: Malcolm Scott <linux-netdev@malc.org.uk>
Cc: Patrick McHardy <kaber@trash.net>,
Pierre Ossman <drzeus-list@drzeus.cx>,
Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: accelerated vlan gives pcap tagged packets untagged
Date: Sat, 6 Aug 2011 18:00:46 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20110806180046.32a57a97@mjolnir.ossman.eu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.00.0907241743180.12037@callisto.malc.org.uk>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1423 bytes --]
Reviving a really old thread.
On Fri, 24 Jul 2009 17:50:26 +0100 (BST)
Malcolm Scott <linux-netdev@malc.org.uk> wrote:
> At 18:35 yesterday, Patrick McHardy wrote:
>
> > Malcolm Scott wrote:
> >
> >> In my case, this is manifesting as the DHCP misbehaviour which Pierre
> >> mentioned. (ISC dhcp3d does not use libpcap, and does not query the
> >> packet socket for the VLAN tag, so it treats every VLAN's packets as for
> >> the default VLAN.)
> >
> > It needs to get the VLAN tag from the auxilliary data.
>
> Right. But backwards compatibility with older apps is the issue. An app
> which doesn't go looking for a VLAN tag in the auxiliary data -- because it
> didn't have to do so prior to 2.6.28 -- will start seeing packets from all
> VLANs rather than just the untagged ones.
>
> Perhaps what's actually needed is another interface which sees _just_ the
> untagged packets, e.g. eth0.0 (0 being a reserved VLAN ID meaning 'no VLAN',
> i.e. equivalent to no 802.1q tag).
>
Has any progress been made on this front? I'm running kernel 2.6.32 and
dhcpd 4.1.1 and that combination is still getting very upset by these
stray packages.
Rgds
--
-- Pierre Ossman
WARNING: This correspondence is being monitored by FRA, a
Swedish intelligence agency. Make sure your server uses
encryption for SMTP traffic and consider using PGP for
end-to-end encryption.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 230 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-06 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-08 11:37 accelerated vlan gives pcap tagged packets untagged Pierre Ossman
2009-02-08 23:26 ` Francois Romieu
2009-02-09 13:23 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-02-09 13:34 ` Pierre Ossman
2009-02-09 13:39 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-07-23 16:08 ` Malcolm Scott
2009-07-23 16:35 ` Patrick McHardy
2009-07-24 16:50 ` Malcolm Scott
2011-08-06 16:00 ` Pierre Ossman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20110806180046.32a57a97@mjolnir.ossman.eu \
--to=pierre-list@ossman.eu \
--cc=drzeus-list@drzeus.cx \
--cc=kaber@trash.net \
--cc=linux-netdev@malc.org.uk \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).