From: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
To: paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Maciej Rutecki <maciej.rutecki@gmail.com>,
Florian Mickler <florian@mickler.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Kernel Testers List <kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux ACPI <linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux PM List <linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org>,
Linux SCSI List <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Wireless List <linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org>,
DRI <dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org>
Subject: Re: 3.1-rc1-git9: Reported regressions 2.6.39 -> 3.0
Date: Mon, 15 Aug 2011 19:43:57 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <201108151943.58179.rjw@sisk.pl> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20110815153759.GF2389@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On Monday, August 15, 2011, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 14, 2011 at 09:02:27PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > [NOTE:
> > We already have a bug entry for tracking regressions from 3.0:
> >
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40982
> >
> > but there are no reports linked to it, mostly because Maciej is on vacation,
> > but also because the frequency of reporting regressions has been low
> > recently. So, if you're seeing a regression from 3.0, please let us know.]
> >
> > This message contains a list of some post-2.6.39 regressions introduced before
> > 3.0, for which there are no fixes in the mainline known to the tracking team.
> > If any of them have been fixed already, please let us know.
> >
> > If you know of any other unresolved post-2.6.39 regressions, please let us know
> > either and we'll add them to the list. Also, please let us know if any
> > of the entries below are invalid.
> >
> > Each entry from the list will be sent additionally in an automatic reply to
> > this message with CCs to the people involved in reporting and handling the
> > issue.
> >
> >
> > Listed regressions statistics:
> >
> > Date Total Pending Unresolved
> > ----------------------------------------
> > 2011-08-14 63 22 19
> >
> >
> > Unresolved regressions
> > ----------------------
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40282
> > Subject : IP forwarding regression since 3.0-rc6
> > Submitter : Stephan Seitz <stse+lkml@fsing.rootsland.net>
> > Date : 2011-07-25 12:51 (21 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20110725T141145.GA.2ae38.stse@fsing.rootsland.net>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131159880004908&w=2
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40172
> > Subject : lockdep trace from post 3.0.
> > Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
> > Date : 2011-07-24 1:32 (22 days old)
> > Message-ID : <20110724013257.GA6777@redhat.com>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=131147120206819&w=2
> >
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=40092
> > Subject : RCU stall in linux-3.0.0
> > Submitter : Philip Armstrong <phil@kantaka.co.uk>
> > Date : 2011-07-25 21:44 (21 days old)
>
> This one was due the the CPU's idea of the current time getting way
> out of sync (as in more than a minute's worth of disagreement, which is
> pretty impressive when you think about it). So what happened is that
> one CPU decided that the current grace period was a full minute old
> immediately, and thus started screaming piteously. John Stultz provided
> a configuration workaround, and he and Thomas Gleixner would be working
> out the long-term fix.
Thanks for the update!
Rafael
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-08-15 17:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-08-14 19:02 3.1-rc1-git9: Reported regressions 2.6.39 -> 3.0 Rafael J. Wysocki
2011-08-15 15:37 ` Paul E. McKenney
2011-08-15 17:43 ` Rafael J. Wysocki [this message]
2011-08-15 21:22 ` Bernd Schubert
[not found] ` <4E498E09.1000208-97jfqw80gc6171pxa8y+qA@public.gmane.org>
2011-08-16 14:57 ` Florian Mickler
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=201108151943.58179.rjw@sisk.pl \
--to=rjw@sisk.pl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org \
--cc=florian@mickler.org \
--cc=kernel-testers@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-acpi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@lists.linux-foundation.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maciej.rutecki@gmail.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).