[PATCH v13 0/6] flexcan: Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010)

[PATCH v13 0/6] flexcan: Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010)

[Robin Holt]

David,

The following set of patches have been reviewed by the above parties and
all comments have been integrated.  Although the patches stray from the
drivers/net/can directory, the diversions are related to changes for
the flexcan driver.

The patch set is based upon your net-next-2.6 tree's commit 6c37e46.

Could you please queue these up for the next appropriate push to Linus'
tree?

Thanks,
Robin Holt

[PATCH v13 1/6] flexcan: Remove #include <mach/clock.h>

[Robin Holt]

powerpc does not have a mach-####/clock.h.  When testing, I found neither
arm nor powerpc needed the mach/clock.h at all so I removed it.

Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: PPC list <linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/net/can/flexcan.c |    2 --
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
index 1767811..586b2cd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
@@ -35,8 +35,6 @@
 #include <linux/module.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 
-#include <mach/clock.h>
-
 #define DRV_NAME			"flexcan"
 
 /* 8 for RX fifo and 2 error handling */
-- 
1.7.2.1

[PATCH v13 2/6] flexcan: Abstract off read/write for big/little endian.

[Robin Holt]

Make flexcan driver handle register reads in the appropriate endianess.
This was a basic search and replace and then define some inlines.

Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: PPC list <linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>
---
 drivers/net/can/flexcan.c |  140 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
 1 files changed, 83 insertions(+), 57 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
index 586b2cd..68cbe52 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
@@ -190,6 +190,31 @@ static struct can_bittiming_const flexcan_bittiming_const = {
 };
 
 /*
+ * Abstract off the read/write for arm versus ppc.
+ */
+#if defined(__BIG_ENDIAN)
+static inline u32 flexcan_read(void __iomem *addr)
+{
+	return in_be32(addr);
+}
+
+static inline void flexcan_write(u32 val, void __iomem *addr)
+{
+	out_be32(addr, val);
+}
+#else
+static inline u32 flexcan_read(void __iomem *addr)
+{
+	return readl(addr);
+}
+
+static inline void flexcan_write(u32 val, void __iomem *addr)
+{
+	writel(val, addr);
+}
+#endif
+
+/*
  * Swtich transceiver on or off
  */
 static void flexcan_transceiver_switch(const struct flexcan_priv *priv, int on)
@@ -210,9 +235,9 @@ static inline void flexcan_chip_enable(struct flexcan_priv *priv)
 	struct flexcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->base;
 	u32 reg;
 
-	reg = readl(&regs->mcr);
+	reg = flexcan_read(&regs->mcr);
 	reg &= ~FLEXCAN_MCR_MDIS;
-	writel(reg, &regs->mcr);
+	flexcan_write(reg, &regs->mcr);
 
 	udelay(10);
 }
@@ -222,9 +247,9 @@ static inline void flexcan_chip_disable(struct flexcan_priv *priv)
 	struct flexcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->base;
 	u32 reg;
 
-	reg = readl(&regs->mcr);
+	reg = flexcan_read(&regs->mcr);
 	reg |= FLEXCAN_MCR_MDIS;
-	writel(reg, &regs->mcr);
+	flexcan_write(reg, &regs->mcr);
 }
 
 static int flexcan_get_berr_counter(const struct net_device *dev,
@@ -232,7 +257,7 @@ static int flexcan_get_berr_counter(const struct net_device *dev,
 {
 	const struct flexcan_priv *priv = netdev_priv(dev);
 	struct flexcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->base;
-	u32 reg = readl(&regs->ecr);
+	u32 reg = flexcan_read(&regs->ecr);
 
 	bec->txerr = (reg >> 0) & 0xff;
 	bec->rxerr = (reg >> 8) & 0xff;
@@ -266,15 +291,15 @@ static int flexcan_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
 
 	if (cf->can_dlc > 0) {
 		u32 data = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)&cf->data[0]);
-		writel(data, &regs->cantxfg[FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID].data[0]);
+		flexcan_write(data, &regs->cantxfg[FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID].data[0]);
 	}
 	if (cf->can_dlc > 3) {
 		u32 data = be32_to_cpup((__be32 *)&cf->data[4]);
-		writel(data, &regs->cantxfg[FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID].data[1]);
+		flexcan_write(data, &regs->cantxfg[FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID].data[1]);
 	}
 
-	writel(can_id, &regs->cantxfg[FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID].can_id);
-	writel(ctrl, &regs->cantxfg[FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID].can_ctrl);
+	flexcan_write(can_id, &regs->cantxfg[FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID].can_id);
+	flexcan_write(ctrl, &regs->cantxfg[FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID].can_ctrl);
 
 	kfree_skb(skb);
 
@@ -462,8 +487,8 @@ static void flexcan_read_fifo(const struct net_device *dev,
 	struct flexcan_mb __iomem *mb = &regs->cantxfg[0];
 	u32 reg_ctrl, reg_id;
 
-	reg_ctrl = readl(&mb->can_ctrl);
-	reg_id = readl(&mb->can_id);
+	reg_ctrl = flexcan_read(&mb->can_ctrl);
+	reg_id = flexcan_read(&mb->can_id);
 	if (reg_ctrl & FLEXCAN_MB_CNT_IDE)
 		cf->can_id = ((reg_id >> 0) & CAN_EFF_MASK) | CAN_EFF_FLAG;
 	else
@@ -473,12 +498,12 @@ static void flexcan_read_fifo(const struct net_device *dev,
 		cf->can_id |= CAN_RTR_FLAG;
 	cf->can_dlc = get_can_dlc((reg_ctrl >> 16) & 0xf);
 
-	*(__be32 *)(cf->data + 0) = cpu_to_be32(readl(&mb->data[0]));
-	*(__be32 *)(cf->data + 4) = cpu_to_be32(readl(&mb->data[1]));
+	*(__be32 *)(cf->data + 0) = cpu_to_be32(flexcan_read(&mb->data[0]));
+	*(__be32 *)(cf->data + 4) = cpu_to_be32(flexcan_read(&mb->data[1]));
 
 	/* mark as read */
-	writel(FLEXCAN_IFLAG_RX_FIFO_AVAILABLE, &regs->iflag1);
-	readl(&regs->timer);
+	flexcan_write(FLEXCAN_IFLAG_RX_FIFO_AVAILABLE, &regs->iflag1);
+	flexcan_read(&regs->timer);
 }
 
 static int flexcan_read_frame(struct net_device *dev)
@@ -514,17 +539,17 @@ static int flexcan_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int quota)
 	 * The error bits are cleared on read,
 	 * use saved value from irq handler.
 	 */
-	reg_esr = readl(&regs->esr) | priv->reg_esr;
+	reg_esr = flexcan_read(&regs->esr) | priv->reg_esr;
 
 	/* handle state changes */
 	work_done += flexcan_poll_state(dev, reg_esr);
 
 	/* handle RX-FIFO */
-	reg_iflag1 = readl(&regs->iflag1);
+	reg_iflag1 = flexcan_read(&regs->iflag1);
 	while (reg_iflag1 & FLEXCAN_IFLAG_RX_FIFO_AVAILABLE &&
 	       work_done < quota) {
 		work_done += flexcan_read_frame(dev);
-		reg_iflag1 = readl(&regs->iflag1);
+		reg_iflag1 = flexcan_read(&regs->iflag1);
 	}
 
 	/* report bus errors */
@@ -534,8 +559,8 @@ static int flexcan_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int quota)
 	if (work_done < quota) {
 		napi_complete(napi);
 		/* enable IRQs */
-		writel(FLEXCAN_IFLAG_DEFAULT, &regs->imask1);
-		writel(priv->reg_ctrl_default, &regs->ctrl);
+		flexcan_write(FLEXCAN_IFLAG_DEFAULT, &regs->imask1);
+		flexcan_write(priv->reg_ctrl_default, &regs->ctrl);
 	}
 
 	return work_done;
@@ -549,9 +574,9 @@ static irqreturn_t flexcan_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	struct flexcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->base;
 	u32 reg_iflag1, reg_esr;
 
-	reg_iflag1 = readl(&regs->iflag1);
-	reg_esr = readl(&regs->esr);
-	writel(FLEXCAN_ESR_ERR_INT, &regs->esr);	/* ACK err IRQ */
+	reg_iflag1 = flexcan_read(&regs->iflag1);
+	reg_esr = flexcan_read(&regs->esr);
+	flexcan_write(FLEXCAN_ESR_ERR_INT, &regs->esr);	/* ACK err IRQ */
 
 	/*
 	 * schedule NAPI in case of:
@@ -567,16 +592,16 @@ static irqreturn_t flexcan_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
 		 * save them for later use.
 		 */
 		priv->reg_esr = reg_esr & FLEXCAN_ESR_ERR_BUS;
-		writel(FLEXCAN_IFLAG_DEFAULT & ~FLEXCAN_IFLAG_RX_FIFO_AVAILABLE,
-		       &regs->imask1);
-		writel(priv->reg_ctrl_default & ~FLEXCAN_CTRL_ERR_ALL,
+		flexcan_write(FLEXCAN_IFLAG_DEFAULT &
+			~FLEXCAN_IFLAG_RX_FIFO_AVAILABLE, &regs->imask1);
+		flexcan_write(priv->reg_ctrl_default & ~FLEXCAN_CTRL_ERR_ALL,
 		       &regs->ctrl);
 		napi_schedule(&priv->napi);
 	}
 
 	/* FIFO overflow */
 	if (reg_iflag1 & FLEXCAN_IFLAG_RX_FIFO_OVERFLOW) {
-		writel(FLEXCAN_IFLAG_RX_FIFO_OVERFLOW, &regs->iflag1);
+		flexcan_write(FLEXCAN_IFLAG_RX_FIFO_OVERFLOW, &regs->iflag1);
 		dev->stats.rx_over_errors++;
 		dev->stats.rx_errors++;
 	}
@@ -585,7 +610,7 @@ static irqreturn_t flexcan_irq(int irq, void *dev_id)
 	if (reg_iflag1 & (1 << FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID)) {
 		/* tx_bytes is incremented in flexcan_start_xmit */
 		stats->tx_packets++;
-		writel((1 << FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID), &regs->iflag1);
+		flexcan_write((1 << FLEXCAN_TX_BUF_ID), &regs->iflag1);
 		netif_wake_queue(dev);
 	}
 
@@ -599,7 +624,7 @@ static void flexcan_set_bittiming(struct net_device *dev)
 	struct flexcan_regs __iomem *regs = priv->base;
 	u32 reg;
 
-	reg = readl(&regs->ctrl);
+	reg = flexcan_read(&regs->ctrl);
 	reg &= ~(FLEXCAN_CTRL_PRESDIV(0xff) |
 		 FLEXCAN_CTRL_RJW(0x3) |
 		 FLEXCAN_CTRL_PSEG1(0x7) |
@@ -623,11 +648,11 @@ static void flexcan_set_bittiming(struct net_device *dev)
 		reg |= FLEXCAN_CTRL_SMP;
 
 	dev_info(dev->dev.parent, "writing ctrl=0x%08x\n", reg);
-	writel(reg, &regs->ctrl);
+	flexcan_write(reg, &regs->ctrl);
 
 	/* print chip status */
 	dev_dbg(dev->dev.parent, "%s: mcr=0x%08x ctrl=0x%08x\n", __func__,
-		readl(&regs->mcr), readl(&regs->ctrl));
+		flexcan_read(&regs->mcr), flexcan_read(&regs->ctrl));
 }
 
 /*
@@ -648,10 +673,10 @@ static int flexcan_chip_start(struct net_device *dev)
 	flexcan_chip_enable(priv);
 
 	/* soft reset */
-	writel(FLEXCAN_MCR_SOFTRST, &regs->mcr);
+	flexcan_write(FLEXCAN_MCR_SOFTRST, &regs->mcr);
 	udelay(10);
 
-	reg_mcr = readl(&regs->mcr);
+	reg_mcr = flexcan_read(&regs->mcr);
 	if (reg_mcr & FLEXCAN_MCR_SOFTRST) {
 		dev_err(dev->dev.parent,
 			"Failed to softreset can module (mcr=0x%08x)\n",
@@ -673,12 +698,12 @@ static int flexcan_chip_start(struct net_device *dev)
 	 * choose format C
 	 *
 	 */
-	reg_mcr = readl(&regs->mcr);
+	reg_mcr = flexcan_read(&regs->mcr);
 	reg_mcr |= FLEXCAN_MCR_FRZ | FLEXCAN_MCR_FEN | FLEXCAN_MCR_HALT |
 		FLEXCAN_MCR_SUPV | FLEXCAN_MCR_WRN_EN |
 		FLEXCAN_MCR_IDAM_C;
 	dev_dbg(dev->dev.parent, "%s: writing mcr=0x%08x", __func__, reg_mcr);
-	writel(reg_mcr, &regs->mcr);
+	flexcan_write(reg_mcr, &regs->mcr);
 
 	/*
 	 * CTRL
@@ -696,7 +721,7 @@ static int flexcan_chip_start(struct net_device *dev)
 	 * (FLEXCAN_CTRL_ERR_MSK), too. Otherwise we don't get any
 	 * warning or bus passive interrupts.
 	 */
-	reg_ctrl = readl(&regs->ctrl);
+	reg_ctrl = flexcan_read(&regs->ctrl);
 	reg_ctrl &= ~FLEXCAN_CTRL_TSYN;
 	reg_ctrl |= FLEXCAN_CTRL_BOFF_REC | FLEXCAN_CTRL_LBUF |
 		FLEXCAN_CTRL_ERR_STATE | FLEXCAN_CTRL_ERR_MSK;
@@ -704,38 +729,39 @@ static int flexcan_chip_start(struct net_device *dev)
 	/* save for later use */
 	priv->reg_ctrl_default = reg_ctrl;
 	dev_dbg(dev->dev.parent, "%s: writing ctrl=0x%08x", __func__, reg_ctrl);
-	writel(reg_ctrl, &regs->ctrl);
+	flexcan_write(reg_ctrl, &regs->ctrl);
 
 	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(regs->cantxfg); i++) {
-		writel(0, &regs->cantxfg[i].can_ctrl);
-		writel(0, &regs->cantxfg[i].can_id);
-		writel(0, &regs->cantxfg[i].data[0]);
-		writel(0, &regs->cantxfg[i].data[1]);
+		flexcan_write(0, &regs->cantxfg[i].can_ctrl);
+		flexcan_write(0, &regs->cantxfg[i].can_id);
+		flexcan_write(0, &regs->cantxfg[i].data[0]);
+		flexcan_write(0, &regs->cantxfg[i].data[1]);
 
 		/* put MB into rx queue */
-		writel(FLEXCAN_MB_CNT_CODE(0x4), &regs->cantxfg[i].can_ctrl);
+		flexcan_write(FLEXCAN_MB_CNT_CODE(0x4),
+			&regs->cantxfg[i].can_ctrl);
 	}
 
 	/* acceptance mask/acceptance code (accept everything) */
-	writel(0x0, &regs->rxgmask);
-	writel(0x0, &regs->rx14mask);
-	writel(0x0, &regs->rx15mask);
+	flexcan_write(0x0, &regs->rxgmask);
+	flexcan_write(0x0, &regs->rx14mask);
+	flexcan_write(0x0, &regs->rx15mask);
 
 	flexcan_transceiver_switch(priv, 1);
 
 	/* synchronize with the can bus */
-	reg_mcr = readl(&regs->mcr);
+	reg_mcr = flexcan_read(&regs->mcr);
 	reg_mcr &= ~FLEXCAN_MCR_HALT;
-	writel(reg_mcr, &regs->mcr);
+	flexcan_write(reg_mcr, &regs->mcr);
 
 	priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_ERROR_ACTIVE;
 
 	/* enable FIFO interrupts */
-	writel(FLEXCAN_IFLAG_DEFAULT, &regs->imask1);
+	flexcan_write(FLEXCAN_IFLAG_DEFAULT, &regs->imask1);
 
 	/* print chip status */
 	dev_dbg(dev->dev.parent, "%s: reading mcr=0x%08x ctrl=0x%08x\n",
-		__func__, readl(&regs->mcr), readl(&regs->ctrl));
+		__func__, flexcan_read(&regs->mcr), flexcan_read(&regs->ctrl));
 
 	return 0;
 
@@ -757,12 +783,12 @@ static void flexcan_chip_stop(struct net_device *dev)
 	u32 reg;
 
 	/* Disable all interrupts */
-	writel(0, &regs->imask1);
+	flexcan_write(0, &regs->imask1);
 
 	/* Disable + halt module */
-	reg = readl(&regs->mcr);
+	reg = flexcan_read(&regs->mcr);
 	reg |= FLEXCAN_MCR_MDIS | FLEXCAN_MCR_HALT;
-	writel(reg, &regs->mcr);
+	flexcan_write(reg, &regs->mcr);
 
 	flexcan_transceiver_switch(priv, 0);
 	priv->can.state = CAN_STATE_STOPPED;
@@ -854,24 +880,24 @@ static int __devinit register_flexcandev(struct net_device *dev)
 
 	/* select "bus clock", chip must be disabled */
 	flexcan_chip_disable(priv);
-	reg = readl(&regs->ctrl);
+	reg = flexcan_read(&regs->ctrl);
 	reg |= FLEXCAN_CTRL_CLK_SRC;
-	writel(reg, &regs->ctrl);
+	flexcan_write(reg, &regs->ctrl);
 
 	flexcan_chip_enable(priv);
 
 	/* set freeze, halt and activate FIFO, restrict register access */
-	reg = readl(&regs->mcr);
+	reg = flexcan_read(&regs->mcr);
 	reg |= FLEXCAN_MCR_FRZ | FLEXCAN_MCR_HALT |
 		FLEXCAN_MCR_FEN | FLEXCAN_MCR_SUPV;
-	writel(reg, &regs->mcr);
+	flexcan_write(reg, &regs->mcr);
 
 	/*
 	 * Currently we only support newer versions of this core
 	 * featuring a RX FIFO. Older cores found on some Coldfire
 	 * derivates are not yet supported.
 	 */
-	reg = readl(&regs->mcr);
+	reg = flexcan_read(&regs->mcr);
 	if (!(reg & FLEXCAN_MCR_FEN)) {
 		dev_err(dev->dev.parent,
 			"Could not enable RX FIFO, unsupported core\n");
-- 
1.7.2.1

[PATCH v13 3/6] flexcan: Fix up fsl-flexcan device tree binding.

[Robin Holt]

This patch cleans up the documentation of the device-tree binding for
the Flexcan devices on Freescale's PowerPC and ARM cores. Extra
properties are not used by the driver so we are removing them.

Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>,
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
Cc: socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org,
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Cc: PPC list <linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt    |   61 ++++----------------
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010rdb.dts                 |   10 +---
 arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010si.dtsi                 |   10 +--
 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 64 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt
index 1a729f0..8dfb98b 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt
@@ -1,61 +1,22 @@
-CAN Device Tree Bindings
-------------------------
-2011 Freescale Semiconductor, Inc.
+Flexcan CAN contoller on Freescale's ARM and PowerPC system-on-a-chip (SOC).
 
-fsl,flexcan-v1.0 nodes
------------------------
-In addition to the required compatible-, reg- and interrupt-properties, you can
-also specify which clock source shall be used for the controller.
+Required properties:
 
-CPI Clock- Can Protocol Interface Clock
-	This CLK_SRC bit of CTRL(control register) selects the clock source to
-	the CAN Protocol Interface(CPI) to be either the peripheral clock
-	(driven by the PLL) or the crystal oscillator clock. The selected clock
-	is the one fed to the prescaler to generate the Serial Clock (Sclock).
-	The PRESDIV field of CTRL(control register) controls a prescaler that
-	generates the Serial Clock (Sclock), whose period defines the
-	time quantum used to compose the CAN waveform.
+- compatible : Should be "fsl,<processor>-flexcan"
 
-Can Engine Clock Source
-	There are two sources for CAN clock
-	- Platform Clock  It represents the bus clock
-	- Oscillator Clock
+  An implementation should also claim any of the following compatibles
+  that it is fully backwards compatible with:
 
-	Peripheral Clock (PLL)
-	--------------
-		     |
-		    ---------		      -------------
-		    |       |CPI Clock	      | Prescaler |       Sclock
-		    |       |---------------->| (1.. 256) |------------>
-		    ---------		      -------------
-                     |  |
-	--------------  ---------------------CLK_SRC
-	Oscillator Clock
+  - fsl,p1010-flexcan
 
-- fsl,flexcan-clock-source : CAN Engine Clock Source.This property selects
-			     the peripheral clock. PLL clock is fed to the
-			     prescaler to generate the Serial Clock (Sclock).
-			     Valid values are "oscillator" and "platform"
-			     "oscillator": CAN engine clock source is oscillator clock.
-			     "platform" The CAN engine clock source is the bus clock
-		             (platform clock).
+- reg : Offset and length of the register set for this device
+- interrupts : Interrupt tuple for this device
 
-- fsl,flexcan-clock-divider : for the reference and system clock, an additional
-			      clock divider can be specified.
-- clock-frequency: frequency required to calculate the bitrate for FlexCAN.
+Example:
 
-Note:
-	- v1.0 of flexcan-v1.0 represent the IP block version for P1010 SOC.
-	- P1010 does not have oscillator as the Clock Source.So the default
-	  Clock Source is platform clock.
-Examples:
-
-	can0@1c000 {
-		compatible = "fsl,flexcan-v1.0";
+	can@1c000 {
+		compatible = "fsl,p1010-flexcan";
 		reg = <0x1c000 0x1000>;
 		interrupts = <48 0x2>;
 		interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
-		fsl,flexcan-clock-source = "platform";
-		fsl,flexcan-clock-divider = <2>;
-		clock-frequency = <fixed by u-boot>;
 	};
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010rdb.dts b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010rdb.dts
index 6b33b73..d6c669c 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010rdb.dts
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010rdb.dts
@@ -23,6 +23,8 @@
 		ethernet2 = &enet2;
 		pci0 = &pci0;
 		pci1 = &pci1;
+		can0 = &can0;
+		can1 = &can1;
 	};
 
 	memory {
@@ -169,14 +171,6 @@
 			};
 		};
 
-		can0@1c000 {
-			fsl,flexcan-clock-source = "platform";
-		};
-
-		can1@1d000 {
-			fsl,flexcan-clock-source = "platform";
-		};
-
 		usb@22000 {
 			phy_type = "utmi";
 		};
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010si.dtsi b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010si.dtsi
index 7f51104..cabe0a4 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010si.dtsi
+++ b/arch/powerpc/boot/dts/p1010si.dtsi
@@ -140,20 +140,18 @@
 			interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
 		};
 
-		can0@1c000 {
-			compatible = "fsl,flexcan-v1.0";
+		can0: can@1c000 {
+			compatible = "fsl,p1010-flexcan";
 			reg = <0x1c000 0x1000>;
 			interrupts = <48 0x2>;
 			interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
-			fsl,flexcan-clock-divider = <2>;
 		};
 
-		can1@1d000 {
-			compatible = "fsl,flexcan-v1.0";
+		can1: can@1d000 {
+			compatible = "fsl,p1010-flexcan";
 			reg = <0x1d000 0x1000>;
 			interrupts = <61 0x2>;
 			interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
-			fsl,flexcan-clock-divider = <2>;
 		};
 
 		L2: l2-cache-controller@20000 {
-- 
1.7.2.1

[PATCH v13 4/6] flexcan: Add of_match to platform_device definition.

[Robin Holt]

On powerpc, the OpenFirmware devices are not matched without specifying
an of_match array.  Introduce that array as that is used for matching
on the Freescale P1010 processor.

Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely-s3s/WqlpOiPyB63q8FvJNQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org
Cc: PPC list <linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: devicetree-discuss-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org
---
 drivers/net/can/flexcan.c |   13 ++++++++++++-
 1 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
index 68cbe52..cc1e0a7 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
@@ -1027,8 +1027,19 @@ static int __devexit flexcan_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static struct of_device_id flexcan_of_match[] = {
+	{
+		.compatible = "fsl,p1010-flexcan",
+	},
+	{},
+};
+
 static struct platform_driver flexcan_driver = {
-	.driver.name = DRV_NAME,
+	.driver = {
+		.name = DRV_NAME,
+		.owner = THIS_MODULE,
+		.of_match_table = flexcan_of_match,
+	},
 	.probe = flexcan_probe,
 	.remove = __devexit_p(flexcan_remove),
 };
-- 
1.7.2.1

[PATCH v13 6/6] flexcan: Add flexcan device support for p1010rdb.

[Robin Holt]

Allow the p1010 processor to select the flexcan network driver.

Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org>
Acked-by: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl-bIcnvbaLZ9MEGnE8C9+IrQ@public.gmane.org>,
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg-5Yr1BZd7O62+XT7JhA+gdA@public.gmane.org>,
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300-KZfg59tc24xl57MIdRCFDg@public.gmane.org>
Cc: socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org,
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
Cc: PPC list <linuxppc-dev-uLR06cmDAlY/bJ5BZ2RsiQ@public.gmane.org>
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak-XVmvHMARGAS8U2dJNN8I7kB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org>
---
 arch/powerpc/Kconfig |    2 ++
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
index 6926b61..47682b6 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
+++ b/arch/powerpc/Kconfig
@@ -656,6 +656,8 @@ config SBUS
 
 config FSL_SOC
 	bool
+	select HAVE_CAN_FLEXCAN if NET && CAN
+	select PPC_CLOCK if CAN_FLEXCAN
 
 config FSL_PCI
  	bool
-- 
1.7.2.1

Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] flexcan: Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010)

[David Miller]

From: Robin Holt <holt-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org>
Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2011 22:32:18 -0500

> The following set of patches have been reviewed by the above parties and
> all comments have been integrated.  Although the patches stray from the
> drivers/net/can directory, the diversions are related to changes for
> the flexcan driver.
> 
> The patch set is based upon your net-next-2.6 tree's commit 6c37e46.
> 
> Could you please queue these up for the next appropriate push to Linus'
> tree?

Applied to net-next, thanks!

[PATCH v13 5/6] flexcan: Prefer device tree clock frequency if available.

[Robin Holt]

If our CAN device's device tree node has a clock-frequency property,
then use that value for the can devices clock frequency.  If not, fall
back to asking the platform/mach code for the clock frequency associated
with the flexcan device.

Signed-off-by: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
Acked-by: Wolfgang Grandegger <wg@grandegger.com>,
Cc: Kumar Gala <galak@kernel.crashing.org>
Cc: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>,
Cc: U Bhaskar-B22300 <B22300@freescale.com>
Cc: Scott Wood <scottwood@freescale.com>
Cc: Grant Likely <grant.likely@secretlab.ca>
Cc: socketcan-core@lists.berlios.de,
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org,
Cc: PPC list <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>
Cc: devicetree-discuss@lists.ozlabs.org
---
 .../devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt    |    2 +
 drivers/net/can/flexcan.c                          |   34 ++++++++++++++-----
 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)

diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt
index 8dfb98b..1ad80d5 100644
--- a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/net/can/fsl-flexcan.txt
@@ -11,6 +11,7 @@ Required properties:
 
 - reg : Offset and length of the register set for this device
 - interrupts : Interrupt tuple for this device
+- clock-frequency : The oscillator frequency driving the flexcan device
 
 Example:
 
@@ -19,4 +20,5 @@ Example:
 		reg = <0x1c000 0x1000>;
 		interrupts = <48 0x2>;
 		interrupt-parent = <&mpic>;
+		clock-frequency = <200000000>; // filled in by bootloader
 	};
diff --git a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
index cc1e0a7..e023379 100644
--- a/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
+++ b/drivers/net/can/flexcan.c
@@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/list.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <linux/of.h>
 #include <linux/platform_device.h>
 
 #define DRV_NAME			"flexcan"
@@ -925,16 +926,29 @@ static int __devinit flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	struct net_device *dev;
 	struct flexcan_priv *priv;
 	struct resource *mem;
-	struct clk *clk;
+	struct clk *clk = NULL;
 	void __iomem *base;
 	resource_size_t mem_size;
 	int err, irq;
+	u32 clock_freq = 0;
+
+	if (pdev->dev.of_node) {
+		const u32 *clock_freq_p;
 
-	clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
-	if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
-		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no clock defined\n");
-		err = PTR_ERR(clk);
-		goto failed_clock;
+		clock_freq_p = of_get_property(pdev->dev.of_node,
+						"clock-frequency", NULL);
+		if (clock_freq_p)
+			clock_freq = *clock_freq_p;
+	}
+
+	if (!clock_freq) {
+		clk = clk_get(&pdev->dev, NULL);
+		if (IS_ERR(clk)) {
+			dev_err(&pdev->dev, "no clock defined\n");
+			err = PTR_ERR(clk);
+			goto failed_clock;
+		}
+		clock_freq = clk_get_rate(clk);
 	}
 
 	mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
@@ -967,7 +981,7 @@ static int __devinit flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	dev->flags |= IFF_ECHO; /* we support local echo in hardware */
 
 	priv = netdev_priv(dev);
-	priv->can.clock.freq = clk_get_rate(clk);
+	priv->can.clock.freq = clock_freq;
 	priv->can.bittiming_const = &flexcan_bittiming_const;
 	priv->can.do_set_mode = flexcan_set_mode;
 	priv->can.do_get_berr_counter = flexcan_get_berr_counter;
@@ -1002,7 +1016,8 @@ static int __devinit flexcan_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
  failed_map:
 	release_mem_region(mem->start, mem_size);
  failed_get:
-	clk_put(clk);
+	if (clk)
+		clk_put(clk);
  failed_clock:
 	return err;
 }
@@ -1020,7 +1035,8 @@ static int __devexit flexcan_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
 	mem = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
 	release_mem_region(mem->start, resource_size(mem));
 
-	clk_put(priv->clk);
+	if (priv->clk)
+		clk_put(priv->clk);
 
 	free_candev(dev);
 
-- 
1.7.2.1

Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] flexcan: Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010)

[Kumar Gala]

On Aug 16, 2011, at 10:32 PM, Robin Holt wrote:

> David,
> 
> The following set of patches have been reviewed by the above parties and
> all comments have been integrated.  Although the patches stray from the
> drivers/net/can directory, the diversions are related to changes for
> the flexcan driver.
> 
> The patch set is based upon your net-next-2.6 tree's commit 6c37e46.
> 
> Could you please queue these up for the next appropriate push to Linus'
> tree?
> 
> Thanks,
> Robin Holt

Robin,

Do you remember why we went with just 'fsl,p1010-flexcan' as the device tree compatible?  Do we feel the flex can on P1010 isn't the same as on MPC5xxx? or the ARM SoCs?

- k

Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] flexcan: Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010)

[Wolfgang Grandegger]

Hi Kumar,

On 10/18/2011 07:44 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
> On Aug 16, 2011, at 10:32 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> 
>> David,
>>
>> The following set of patches have been reviewed by the above parties and
>> all comments have been integrated.  Although the patches stray from the
>> drivers/net/can directory, the diversions are related to changes for
>> the flexcan driver.
>>
>> The patch set is based upon your net-next-2.6 tree's commit 6c37e46.
>>
>> Could you please queue these up for the next appropriate push to Linus'
>> tree?
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Robin Holt
> 
> Robin,
> 
> Do you remember why we went with just 'fsl,p1010-flexcan' as the device tree compatible?  Do we feel the flex can on P1010 isn't the same as on MPC5xxx? or the ARM SoCs?

The MPC5xxx SOCs have a MSCAN controller, which is different to the
Flexcan and handled by another driver. But the Flexcan's  on the
Freescale ARM SOCs are identical and supported by that driver as well
and "fsl,flexcan" would work *perfectly*. Actually Grant instructed use
to be more explicit and use "fsl,p1010-flexcan". Anyway,
"fsl,p1010-flexcan" should work on ARM SOCs if the source frequency is
provided via boot loader or the DTS file. Compatibility was one of our
main concerns.

Wolfgang.

Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] flexcan: Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010)

[Robin Holt]

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 12:44:07AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
> On Aug 16, 2011, at 10:32 PM, Robin Holt wrote:
> 
> > David,
> > 
> > The following set of patches have been reviewed by the above parties and
> > all comments have been integrated.  Although the patches stray from the
> > drivers/net/can directory, the diversions are related to changes for
> > the flexcan driver.
> > 
> > The patch set is based upon your net-next-2.6 tree's commit 6c37e46.
> > 
> > Could you please queue these up for the next appropriate push to Linus'
> > tree?
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Robin Holt
> 
> Robin,
> 
> Do you remember why we went with just 'fsl,p1010-flexcan' as the device tree compatible?  Do we feel the flex can on P1010 isn't the same as on MPC5xxx? or the ARM SoCs?

The decision was due to the fact there is no true "generic" fsl.flexcan
chip free of any SOC implementation and therefore not something which
could be separately defined.  That decision was made by Grant Likely.
I will inline that email below.

Robin


On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:13:50AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com> wrote:
> > Grant,
> >
> > Earlier, you had asked for a more specific name for the compatible
> > property of the Freescale flexcan device.  I still have not gotten a
> > more specific answer.  Hopefully Marc can give you more details about
> > the flexcan implementations.
> 
> If there is no ip core version, then just stick with the
> fsl,<soc>-flexcan name and drop "fsl,flexcan".  Marketing may say
> flexcan is flexcan, but hardware engineers like to change things.
> Trying to be too generic in compatible values will just lead to
> problems in the future.

Thanks,
Robin

Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] flexcan: Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010)

[Kumar Gala]

>> Robin,
>> 
>> Do you remember why we went with just 'fsl,p1010-flexcan' as the device tree compatible?  Do we feel the flex can on P1010 isn't the same as on MPC5xxx? or the ARM SoCs?
> 
> The decision was due to the fact there is no true "generic" fsl.flexcan
> chip free of any SOC implementation and therefore not something which
> could be separately defined.  That decision was made by Grant Likely.
> I will inline that email below.
> 
> Robin


Thanks, I'll look into this internally at FSL.  I think its confusing as hell to have "fsl,p1010-flexcan" in an ARM .dts and don't think any reasonable ARM customer of FSL would know to put a PPC SOC name in their .dts.  I'll ask the HW guys what's going on so we can come up with a bit more generic name so we don't have to constantly change this.  Even if its just:

fsl,ppc-flexcan & fsl,arm-flexcan.

> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:13:50AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Robin Holt <holt-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org> wrote:
>>> Grant,
>>> 
>>> Earlier, you had asked for a more specific name for the compatible
>>> property of the Freescale flexcan device.  I still have not gotten a
>>> more specific answer.  Hopefully Marc can give you more details about
>>> the flexcan implementations.
>> 
>> If there is no ip core version, then just stick with the
>> fsl,<soc>-flexcan name and drop "fsl,flexcan".  Marketing may say
>> flexcan is flexcan, but hardware engineers like to change things.
>> Trying to be too generic in compatible values will just lead to
>> problems in the future.
> 
> Thanks,
> Robin

- k

Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] flexcan: Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010)

[Marc Kleine-Budde]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 857 bytes --]

On 10/18/2011 01:43 PM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> Thanks, I'll look into this internally at FSL.  I think its confusing
> as hell to have "fsl,p1010-flexcan" in an ARM .dts and don't think
> any reasonable ARM customer of FSL would know to put a PPC SOC name
> in their .dts.  I'll ask the HW guys what's going on so we can come
> up with a bit more generic name so we don't have to constantly change
> this.  Even if its just:
> 
> fsl,ppc-flexcan & fsl,arm-flexcan.

If you talk the HW guys ask them for a name for the coldfire flexcan
core, too please ;)

cheers, Marc

-- 
Pengutronix e.K.                  | Marc Kleine-Budde           |
Industrial Linux Solutions        | Phone: +49-231-2826-924     |
Vertretung West/Dortmund          | Fax:   +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686  | http://www.pengutronix.de   |


[-- Attachment #1.2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 262 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/plain, Size: 188 bytes --]

_______________________________________________
Socketcan-core mailing list
Socketcan-core-0fE9KPoRgkgATYTw5x5z8w@public.gmane.org
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/socketcan-core

Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] flexcan: Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010)

[Robin Holt]

On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 06:43:13AM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
> >> Robin,
> >> 
> >> Do you remember why we went with just 'fsl,p1010-flexcan' as the device tree compatible?  Do we feel the flex can on P1010 isn't the same as on MPC5xxx? or the ARM SoCs?
> > 
> > The decision was due to the fact there is no true "generic" fsl.flexcan
> > chip free of any SOC implementation and therefore not something which
> > could be separately defined.  That decision was made by Grant Likely.
> > I will inline that email below.
> > 
> > Robin
> 
> 
> Thanks, I'll look into this internally at FSL.  I think its confusing as hell to have "fsl,p1010-flexcan" in an ARM .dts and don't think any reasonable ARM customer of FSL would know to put a PPC SOC name in their .dts.  I'll ask the HW guys what's going on so we can come up with a bit more generic name so we don't have to constantly change this.  Even if its just:

Grants argument was that there should then be a fsl,zeba-flexcan which
would define each arm based soc.  The match string could be there and
the devicetree binding would match on each equivalent.

Robin

> 
> fsl,ppc-flexcan & fsl,arm-flexcan.
> 
> > On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 09:13:50AM -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
> >> On Mon, Aug 15, 2011 at 9:03 AM, Robin Holt <holt-sJ/iWh9BUns@public.gmane.org> wrote:
> >>> Grant,
> >>> 
> >>> Earlier, you had asked for a more specific name for the compatible
> >>> property of the Freescale flexcan device.  I still have not gotten a
> >>> more specific answer.  Hopefully Marc can give you more details about
> >>> the flexcan implementations.
> >> 
> >> If there is no ip core version, then just stick with the
> >> fsl,<soc>-flexcan name and drop "fsl,flexcan".  Marketing may say
> >> flexcan is flexcan, but hardware engineers like to change things.
> >> Trying to be too generic in compatible values will just lead to
> >> problems in the future.
> > 
> > Thanks,
> > Robin
> 
> - k

Re: [PATCH v13 0/6] flexcan: Add support for powerpc flexcan (freescale p1010)

[Scott Wood]

On 10/18/2011 06:43 AM, Kumar Gala wrote:
> 
>>> Robin,
>>>
>>> Do you remember why we went with just 'fsl,p1010-flexcan' as the device tree compatible?  Do we feel the flex can on P1010 isn't the same as on MPC5xxx? or the ARM SoCs?
>>
>> The decision was due to the fact there is no true "generic" fsl.flexcan
>> chip free of any SOC implementation and therefore not something which
>> could be separately defined.  That decision was made by Grant Likely.
>> I will inline that email below.
>>
>> Robin
> 
> 
> Thanks, I'll look into this internally at FSL.  I think its confusing as hell to have "fsl,p1010-flexcan" in an ARM .dts

It's confusing to have devices labelled in vague ways that we can't tie
back to any real piece of hardware, or even a public architectural spec.
 If you're talking to our hardware people, ask them to put public names
and versions, guaranteed unique throughout FSL, on all of our logic
blocks -- with public block manuals that have any SW-relevant
integration parameters clearly itemized.

Why is putting "fsl,p1010-flexcan" an an ARM device any more confusing
than putting it on some PowerPC chip that is not a p1010?  Think of it
like a PCI ID, the actual value not being meaningful for much other than
its uniqueness and the ability to find a manual for the hardware.

This has been the recommended practice for quite some time.

> and don't think any reasonable ARM customer of FSL would know to put
> a PPC SOC name in their .dts.  

If an ARM device tree comes along that just has
"fsl,some-arm-chip-flexcan", so what?  Let the same driver bind against
both, again like PCI IDs.  Additional compatibles are mainly a
convenience to give things a chance to work before the driver is updated
(a frequent irritant with PCI IDs and new hardware).

Ideally we would be publishing a sample device tree for our ARM chips
and their peripherals, though. :-P

> I'll ask the HW guys what's going on
> so we can come up with a bit more generic name so we don't have to
> constantly change this.  Even if its just:
> 
> fsl,ppc-flexcan & fsl,arm-flexcan.

Why is CPU instruction set relevant?

Would a QorIQ customer think to check for an existing compatible in
mpc5xxx, or even mpc83xx or mpc86xx?

-Scott