From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [net-next] iproute2: Add new command to IP link to enable/disable VF spoof check Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 14:19:59 -0700 Message-ID: <20110926141959.58d310c0@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <1317055319.2773.41.camel@bwh-desktop> <20110926094719.0cb6c296@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <184D23435BECB444AB6B9D4630C8EC83028F8A71@XMB-RCD-303.cisco.com> <20110926.170049.1943390151354224651.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: benve@cisco.com, bhutchings@solarflare.com, gregory.v.rose@intel.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:46224 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751835Ab1IZVUC (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:20:02 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20110926.170049.1943390151354224651.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Mon, 26 Sep 2011 17:00:49 -0400 (EDT) David Miller wrote: > From: "Christian Benvenuti (benve)" > Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2011 15:54:53 -0500 > > > Does it mean that a Netlink interface becomes official (and backward > > compatibility should not be broken) only once iproute2 starts > > supporting it? > > It needs to be analyzed on a case-by-case basis. Sometimes we can quickly > fix a poorly designed netlink interface is no major tool takes on use of > the feature. If an interface changes before an official release, there is no problem. I.e. if an interface goes through multiple versions while in net-next (or a bug fix during 3.X-rc*) that's fine.