From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] net-netlink: Add a new attribute to expose TOS values via netlink Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 14:09:57 -0700 Message-ID: <20111010140957.69f10b06@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <20111010130713.6df8bfe4@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <1318278745-27734-1-git-send-email-muralira@google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: "David S. Miller\"" , Alexey Kuznetsov , James Morris , Hideaki YOSHIFUJI , Patrick McHardy , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Muraliraja Muniraju Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1318278745-27734-1-git-send-email-muralira@google.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 10 Oct 2011 13:32:25 -0700 Muraliraja Muniraju wrote: > From: Murali Raja > > This patch exposes the tos value for the TCP sockets when the TOS flag > is requested in the ext_flags for the inet_diag request. This would mainly be > used to expose TOS values for both for TCP and UDP sockets. Currently it is > supported for TCP. When netlink support for UDP would be added the support > to expose the TOS values would alse be done. > > Signed-off-by: Murali Raja > --- > Changelog since v1: > - Removing the reserved field. > > include/linux/inet_diag.h | 9 ++++++++- > net/ipv4/inet_diag.c | 7 +++++++ > 2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/include/linux/inet_diag.h b/include/linux/inet_diag.h > index bc8c490..e36093d 100644 > --- a/include/linux/inet_diag.h > +++ b/include/linux/inet_diag.h > @@ -97,9 +97,10 @@ enum { > INET_DIAG_INFO, > INET_DIAG_VEGASINFO, > INET_DIAG_CONG, > + INET_DIAG_TOS, > }; > > -#define INET_DIAG_MAX INET_DIAG_CONG > +#define INET_DIAG_MAX INET_DIAG_TOS > > > /* INET_DIAG_MEM */ > @@ -120,6 +121,12 @@ struct tcpvegas_info { > __u32 tcpv_minrtt; > }; > > +/* INET_DIAG_TOS */ > + > +struct inet_diag_tos { > + __u8 idiag_tos; > +}; I think the idea is a good one, and useful, but want to make the ABI right. With only one entry, this doesn't need to be wrapped in a structure. Also does this work for IPv6 (Transport class) as well?