Re: [PATCH 5/6] xen/netback: Enable netback on HVM guests

Re: [PATCH 5/6] xen/netback: Enable netback on HVM guests

[Ian Campbell]

On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 16:35 +0100, Daniel De Graaf wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>

Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>

Normally netback patches would go in via the networking subsystem
maintainer's tree but since this depends on core Xen patches from this
series and is unlikely to conflict with anything in the net-next tree I
suspect it would make more sense for Konrad to take this one.

David (Miller) does that work for you?

Ian.

> ---
>  drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> index 3af2924..9d80f99 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/xen-netback/netback.c
> @@ -1626,7 +1626,7 @@ static int __init netback_init(void)
>  	int rc = 0;
>  	int group;
>  
> -	if (!xen_pv_domain())
> +	if (!xen_domain())
>  		return -ENODEV;
>  
>  	xen_netbk_group_nr = num_online_cpus();

Re: [PATCH 5/6] xen/netback: Enable netback on HVM guests

[David Miller]

From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:31:08 +0100

> On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 16:35 +0100, Daniel De Graaf wrote:
>> Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
> 
> Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> 
> Normally netback patches would go in via the networking subsystem
> maintainer's tree but since this depends on core Xen patches from this
> series and is unlikely to conflict with anything in the net-next tree I
> suspect it would make more sense for Konrad to take this one.
> 
> David (Miller) does that work for you?

Yes, it does.

Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 5/6] xen/netback: Enable netback on HVM guests

[Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk]

On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 05:34:19AM -0400, David Miller wrote:
> From: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@citrix.com>
> Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 10:31:08 +0100
> 
> > On Thu, 2011-10-20 at 16:35 +0100, Daniel De Graaf wrote:
> >> Signed-off-by: Daniel De Graaf <dgdegra@tycho.nsa.gov>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@citrix.com>
> > 
> > Normally netback patches would go in via the networking subsystem
> > maintainer's tree but since this depends on core Xen patches from this
> > series and is unlikely to conflict with anything in the net-next tree I
> > suspect it would make more sense for Konrad to take this one.
> > 
> > David (Miller) does that work for you?
> 
> Yes, it does.

OK, Can I stick Acked-by: David Miller on that patch?

Thank you.