From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: make bonding slaves honour master's skb->priority Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:22:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20111025.192246.402731945970959971.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20111025110808.27db8487@asterix.rh> <7147.1319561135@death> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: zenczykowski@gmail.com, fbl@redhat.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: fubar@us.ibm.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:55269 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753798Ab1JYXWw convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Tue, 25 Oct 2011 19:22:52 -0400 In-Reply-To: <7147.1319561135@death> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Jay Vosburgh Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:45:35 -0700 > Maciej =AFenczykowski wrote: >=20 >>> I tripped on it few times and never understood why we >>> were fixing the priority at this point. >>> thanks, >> >>It looks like ancient code, going all the way back to something like >>Linux 2.4.14 (if I recall my git blame session correctly). >>I can't think of a good reason for this... >=20 > I believe this line goes back to the beginning, prior to git or > bk. The skb->priority probably meant something different than it doe= s > today. >=20 > In any event, I'm fine with the code change. There's still no > actual log message, but if Davem is ok with that I'm ok with it, give= n > the trivial nature of the change. >=20 > Signed-off-by: Jay Vosburgh Applied, thanks everyone.