netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jiri Pirko <jpirko@redhat.com>
To: Josh Boyer <jwboyer@redhat.com>
Cc: Jesse Brandeburg <jesse.brandeburg@intel.com>,
	Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	kernel-team@fedoraproject.org
Subject: Re: e1000 vlan functionality broken in 3.1
Date: Mon, 21 Nov 2011 23:05:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111121220509.GA2444@minipsycho> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111121192839.GA2585@zod.bos.redhat.com>

Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 08:28:39PM CET, jwboyer@redhat.com wrote:
>Hi All,
>
>We've had a couple of reports of the e1000 driver no longer working with
>tagged VLANs in the 3.1 kernel.  The bug report has much more detail
>here:
>
>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754589
>
>The summary is, if you turn of rxvlan and tx offloading, the driver
>seems to work fine with 3.1 again whereas this wasn't needed on 3.0.
>(Fedora calls 3.0 2.6.40 on Fedora 15, but that is strictly a naming
>thing.)
>
>Looking through the commit logs, 5622e4044a91 seems to be the most
>relevant commit between those versions.  Does anyone have any ideas?


Looking at the patch again, I do not see anything suspicious. Plus the
bugzilla is talking about carrupting tx packets which is really odd. One
thing I can think of is if maybe VLAN tag inserting/striping and enable
VLAN receive filtering might be needed to be enabled/disabled together.
Intel guys should be able to tell.

Thanks.

Jirka

>
>josh

      reply	other threads:[~2011-11-21 22:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-11-21 19:28 e1000 vlan functionality broken in 3.1 Josh Boyer
2011-11-21 22:05 ` Jiri Pirko [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20111121220509.GA2444@minipsycho \
    --to=jpirko@redhat.com \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=jesse.brandeburg@intel.com \
    --cc=jwboyer@redhat.com \
    --cc=kernel-team@fedoraproject.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).