From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 4/4] net: Add Open vSwitch kernel components. Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 20:42:03 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20111122.204203.590853592266420445.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20111122.181930.1186109067515095173.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: dev-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org, netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org, jhs-jkUAjuhPggJWk0Htik3J/w@public.gmane.org To: jesse-l0M0P4e3n4LQT0dZR+AlfA@public.gmane.org Return-path: In-Reply-To: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: dev-bounces-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org Errors-To: dev-bounces-yBygre7rU0TnMu66kgdUjQ@public.gmane.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Jesse Gross Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 17:34:57 -0800 > On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 3:19 PM, David Miller wrote: >> From: Jesse Gross >> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:11:33 -0800 >> >>> As you mention, one of the biggest benefits of Open vSwitch is how >>> simple the kernel portions are (it's less than 6000 lines). =A0It's >>> existed as an out-of-tree project for several years now so it's >>> actually fairly mature already and unlikely that there will be a >>> sudden influx of new code over the coming months. >> >> The packet scheduler classification and packet action infrastructure >> has been around 5 times longer. > = > The only point that I was trying to make with that comment is that > it's unlikely that Open vSwitch will suddenly get more complex due to > the introduction of new code. And it will get instantly less complex if it uses existing infrastructure. There is no reasonable argument against using what we have already.