From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
To: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: pull request: wireless 2011-11-22
Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 15:56:55 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111122205655.GE8452@tuxdriver.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111122.151429.253381379981773726.davem@davemloft.net>
On Tue, Nov 22, 2011 at 03:14:29PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
> From: "John W. Linville" <linville@tuxdriver.com>
> Date: Tue, 22 Nov 2011 14:35:05 -0500
>
> > Here is the latest batch of fixes intended for 3.2. This includes a
> > correction for a user-visible error in mac80211's debugfs info, a fix
> > for a potential memory corrupter in prism54, an endian fix for rt2x00,
> > an endian fix for mac80211, a fix for a NULL derefernce in cfg80211, a
> > locking fix and a deadlock fix for p54spi, and a pair of rt2x00 fixes
> > for handling some spurious interrupts that hardware can generate.
> >
> > Please let me know if there are problems!
>
> The rt2800pci change doesn't look correct.
>
> If the IRQ line is shared with another device, this change will make it
> never see interrupts. Once you say "IRQ_HANDLED" the IRQ dispatch
> stops processing the interrupt handler list.
I thought this at first as well. But looking at the code in
kernel/irq/handle.c doesn't support that conclusion. In fact, every
handler gets invoked no matter what they all return. All of the irq
handler return values are ORed together and passed to note_interrupt.
Only if every irq handler returns IRQ_NONE does the code in
kernel/irq/spurious.c start getting involved.
Anyway, this seems to be safe even for shared interrupts. That said,
this is a bit ugly. But it makes a serious difference in performance
for those afflicted with this issue.
John
--
John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you
linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-11-22 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-11-22 19:35 pull request: wireless 2011-11-22 John W. Linville
2011-11-22 20:14 ` David Miller
2011-11-22 20:56 ` John W. Linville [this message]
2011-11-22 21:05 ` David Miller
2011-11-22 21:13 ` David Miller
2011-11-22 21:26 ` John W. Linville
2011-11-22 21:30 ` Larry Finger
2011-11-22 21:40 ` David Miller
2011-11-23 8:03 ` Stanislaw Gruszka
2011-11-23 8:57 ` David Miller
2011-11-22 21:44 ` John W. Linville
2011-11-22 21:56 ` pull request: wireless 2011-11-22 #2 John W. Linville
2011-11-22 22:37 ` David Miller
2011-11-22 22:41 ` John W. Linville
2011-11-22 23:17 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111122205655.GE8452@tuxdriver.com \
--to=linville@tuxdriver.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).