From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: Missing TCP SYN on loopback, retransmits after 1s Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:29:59 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20111123.172959.909786536317740314.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20111122.192338.1206677511966747729.davem@davemloft.net> <20111122183727.01ab6f04@telperion.jlyo.org> <1322059124.17693.24.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jlyo@jlyo.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:39537 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756304Ab1KWWaE (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2011 17:30:04 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1322059124.17693.24.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2011 15:38:44 +0100 > [PATCH] ipv6: tcp: fix tcp_v6_conn_request() > > Since linux 2.6.26 (commit c6aefafb7ec6 : Add IPv6 support to TCP SYN > cookies), we can drop a SYN packet reusing a TIME_WAIT socket. > > (As a matter of fact we fail to send the SYNACK answer) > > As the client resends its SYN packet after a one second timeout, we > accept it, because first packet removed the TIME_WAIT socket before > being dropped. > > This probably explains why nobody ever noticed or complained. > > Reported-by: Jesse Young > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Applied and queued up for -stable, thanks!