From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 1/2] netem: rate-latency extension
Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:31:19 +0100
Message-ID: <20111124223118.GH2673@hell>
References: <1322156378-23257-1-git-send-email-hagen@jauu.net>
 <1322172898.2872.7.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from alternativer.internetendpunkt.de ([88.198.24.89]:46722 "EHLO
	geheimer.internetendpunkt.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL)
	by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752877Ab1KXWbW (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Thu, 24 Nov 2011 17:31:22 -0500
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <1322172898.2872.7.camel@edumazet-laptop>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

* Eric Dumazet | 2011-11-24 23:14:58 [+0100]:

>Only point is why you chose ratelatency instead of rate ?


Not sure why, it was called rate in v1, then somebody said ratelatency and I
found it more stating. So in v2 it become ratelatency. I have no strong
opinion here - should I generate v3?

Hagen