From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rick Jones Subject: [PATCH net-next] remove an outdated reference to T/TCP Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 12:00:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <20111206200005.836D529006DD@tardy> Reply-To: Rick Jones To: Return-path: Received: from g1t0027.austin.hp.com ([15.216.28.34]:36041 "EHLO g1t0027.austin.hp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752946Ab1LFUAH (ORCPT ); Tue, 6 Dec 2011 15:00:07 -0500 Received: from g1t0038.austin.hp.com (g1t0038.austin.hp.com [16.236.32.44]) by g1t0027.austin.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C28B38354 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 20:00:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from tardy (tardy.cup.hp.com [16.89.64.213]) by g1t0038.austin.hp.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED5303005A for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 20:00:05 +0000 (UTC) Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Remove a particularly out of date bit of comment referring to T/TCP. Signed-off-by: Rick Jones --- diff --git a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c index 0cbb440..123e1be 100644 --- a/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c +++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_input.c @@ -5824,14 +5824,6 @@ int tcp_rcv_state_process(struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb, * we just ignore it, that fits the spec precisely * and avoids incompatibilities. It would be nice in * future to drop through and process the data. - * - * Now that TTCP is starting to be used we ought to - * queue this data. - * But, this leaves one open to an easy denial of - * service attack, and SYN cookies can't defend - * against this problem. So, we drop the data - * in the interest of security over speed unless - * it's still in use. */ kfree_skb(skb); return 0;