From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "John W. Linville" Subject: Re: pull request: wireless 2011-12-15 Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 16:38:22 -0500 Message-ID: <20111215213822.GB2561@tuxdriver.com> References: <20111215191523.GA2561@tuxdriver.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: davem@davemloft.net, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: =?utf-8?B?UmFmYcWCIE1pxYJlY2tp?= Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 09:04:29PM +0100, Rafa=C5=82 Mi=C5=82ecki wrote= : > 2011/12/15 John W. Linville : > > commit 42a3b63bb2ca4996a3d1210a004eae2333f1119e > > > > Dave, > > > > Here are a few more fixes intended for the 3.2 release. =C2=A0They = are > > all small and narrowly focused. >=20 > John, I've made a mistake and didn't use [PATCH 3.2] header to make i= t > clean my patch is fix. Could you take a look at > [PATCH] bcma: support for suspend and resume > please? >=20 > It's not one-liner, but fixes lock ups, which I believe - we really > want to avoid. It's late in the release cycle, and Dave specifically asked me to slow = down. Are these suspend/resume lockups a regression? Or have they always been there? Do they happen to everyone? John --=20 John W. Linville Someday the world will need a hero, and you linville@tuxdriver.com might be all we have. Be ready.