From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] rps: fix insufficient bounds checking in store_rps_dev_flow_table_cnt() Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:41:26 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20111221.144126.2213051521357190879.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1324493459-19764-1-git-send-email-xi.wang@gmail.com> <1324495344.2621.5.camel@edumazet-laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: xi.wang@gmail.com, therbert@google.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:54517 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752615Ab1LUTla convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2011 14:41:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1324495344.2621.5.camel@edumazet-laptop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: =46rom: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 20:22:24 +0100 > Le mercredi 21 d=E9cembre 2011 =E0 13:50 -0500, Xi Wang a =E9crit : >> @@ -665,7 +665,7 @@ static ssize_t store_rps_dev_flow_table_cnt(stru= ct netdev_rx_queue *queue, >> if (count) { >> int i; >> =20 >> - if (count > 1<<30) { >> + if (count > 1<<28) { >> /* Enforce a limit to prevent overflow */ >> return -EINVAL; >> } >=20 >=20 > Really, you should remove this magic number and use instead >=20 > (INT_MAX - RPS_DEV_FLOW_TABLE_SIZE(0)) / sizeof(struct rps_dev_flow) >=20 > Or something like that, because next time we add a field in > rps_dev_flow, test will be obsolete. Agreed.