From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: ICMP packets - ll_temac with Microblaze Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:55:20 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20111221.155520.1406613141134089105.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4EF1EC28.90008@monstr.eu> <1324483144.2301.17.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> <1324487504.2301.36.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: monstr@monstr.eu, john.williams@petalogix.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: eric.dumazet@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:55328 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750915Ab1LUUzY (ORCPT ); Wed, 21 Dec 2011 15:55:24 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1324487504.2301.36.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Eric Dumazet Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2011 18:11:44 +0100 > [PATCH net-next] net: relax rcvbuf limits > > skb->truesize might be big even for a small packet. > > Its even bigger after commit 87fb4b7b533 (net: more accurate skb > truesize) and big MTU. > > We should allow queueing at least one packet per receiver, even with a > low RCVBUF setting. > > Reported-by: Michal Simek > Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet Applied to net-next, although I was tempted to put it into net. We may end up backporting this into -stable at some point, we'll see.