From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: shemminger@vyatta.com
Cc: eric.dumazet@gmail.com, dave.taht@gmail.com,
jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: netem and hierarchical ingress traffic shaping
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 14:36:53 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20111223.143653.1443323405556018049.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20111223110749.7a690685@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Dec 2011 11:07:49 -0800
> So basically, netem, choke, and sfb are incompatible with
> each other. This is not that bad, why not add a flag to qdisc
> ops to indicate which qdisc are using cb and block user from
> trying to do something bogus.
Or we could do what we do in the inet stack, define a layout
that allows the different layers to use different parts of the
CB.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2011-12-23 19:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2011-12-18 5:12 netem and hierarchical ingress traffic shaping John A. Sullivan III
2011-12-18 19:55 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-12-19 16:53 ` John A. Sullivan III
2011-12-23 17:33 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-23 17:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-23 17:54 ` Dave Taht
2011-12-23 18:28 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-23 18:54 ` Dave Taht
2011-12-23 19:07 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-12-23 19:21 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-29 4:26 ` [PATCH net-next] netem: fix classful handling Eric Dumazet
2011-12-29 6:17 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-12-29 9:12 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-29 16:52 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-12-29 17:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-29 17:43 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-12-29 18:10 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-29 18:25 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2011-12-29 18:31 ` Stephen Hemminger
2011-12-29 18:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2011-12-30 22:12 ` David Miller
2011-12-23 19:36 ` David Miller [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20111223.143653.1443323405556018049.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dave.taht@gmail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=jsullivan@opensourcedevel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=shemminger@vyatta.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).