From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: The mystery of optimistic ipv6 DAD handling Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:39:33 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20111228.133933.866545698956085305.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20111227.140652.1729386263761283235.davem@davemloft.net> <20111227.145305.229364634255751368.davem@davemloft.net> <20111228151928.GA12025@neilslaptop.think-freely.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: nhorman@tuxdriver.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:56710 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752649Ab1L1Sku (ORCPT ); Wed, 28 Dec 2011 13:40:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111228151928.GA12025@neilslaptop.think-freely.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Neil Horman Date: Wed, 28 Dec 2011 10:19:28 -0500 > Yeah, If the premise that the test never triggers is true (and it seems like > you've confirmed that), then theres no harm in removing it. It still > seems like we might still need the test somewhere (maybe on a manual route add). > I've family in town, so I'm not able to look at this closely today, but I'd say this > is at least a harmless change right now. Lets take this change, and I'll > re-read the RFC and look for appropriate code paths where we may need this > test in a few days. Thanks Dave! > > Acked-By: Neil Horman Thanks for reviewing Neil, I've applied this patch to net-next.