From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] skge: restore multicast rx filter on resume Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 02:56:11 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20111229.025611.2043166821951238153.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20111228092714.0a6d5f80@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <20111228.130908.182833189468208987.davem@davemloft.net> <20111229064849.GB8041@florz.florz.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: shemminger@vyatta.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: florz@florz.de Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:60540 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751157Ab1L2H5W (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Dec 2011 02:57:22 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20111229064849.GB8041@florz.florz.dyndns.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Florian Zumbiehl Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 07:48:50 +0100 > --- a/drivers/net/skge.c > +++ b/drivers/net/skge.c This file no longer exists in the current source tree. All of the ethernet drivers have been moved to various directories under drivers/net/ethernet Please do not generate patches against older source trees. And when I ask you to post a patch anew, please make it clean. In this case you replied to my email, added some unrelated commentary, and then included the commit log message and the patch. This is not the correct way to do things. Post a fresh email, not a reply, with a clean Subject line and the email body contents only contain the commit log message and the subsequent patch. If you don't do things the correct way, then the person applying your patch has to do a lot of work editing things. If you do it the right way, adding your patch is very easy. See: http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html for more details