netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] virtio_net: use non-reentrant workqueue.
       [not found] <87ehvogitg.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
@ 2011-12-29 10:43 ` Rusty Russell
  2011-12-29 20:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Rusty Russell @ 2011-12-29 10:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: netdev; +Cc: Michael S. Tsirkin, Tejun Heo

Michael S. Tsirkin also noticed that we could run the refill work
multiple CPUs: if we kick off a refill on one CPU and then on another,
they would both manipulate the queue at the same time (they use
napi_disable to avoid racing against the receive handler itself).

Tejun points out that this is what the WQ_NON_REENTRANT flag is for,
and that there is a convenient system kthread we can use.

Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
---
 drivers/net/virtio_net.c |    6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
--- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
+++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_stru
 	/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
 	 * we will *never* try to fill again. */
 	if (still_empty)
-		schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, HZ/2);
+		queue_delayed_work(system_nrt_wq, &vi->refill, HZ/2);
 }
 
 static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
@@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ again:
 
 	if (vi->num < vi->max / 2) {
 		if (!try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_ATOMIC))
-			schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
+			queue_delayed_work(system_nrt_wq, &vi->refill, 0);
 	}
 
 	/* Out of packets? */
@@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_devic
 
 	/* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */
 	if (!try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_KERNEL))
-		schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
+		queue_delayed_work(system_nrt_wq, &vi->refill, 0);
 
 	virtnet_napi_enable(vi);
 	return 0;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: use non-reentrant workqueue.
       [not found] <87ehvogitg.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
  2011-12-29 10:43 ` [PATCH] virtio_net: use non-reentrant workqueue Rusty Russell
@ 2011-12-29 20:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
  2011-12-29 21:44   ` David Miller
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Michael S. Tsirkin @ 2011-12-29 20:33 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Rusty Russell; +Cc: netdev, Tejun Heo

On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 01:55:47PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
> Michael S. Tsirkin also noticed that we could run the refill work
> multiple CPUs: if we kick off a refill on one CPU and then on another,
> they would both manipulate the queue at the same time (they use
> napi_disable to avoid racing against the receive handler itself).
> 
> Tejun points out that this is what the WQ_NON_REENTRANT flag is for,
> and that there is a convenient system kthread we can use.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>

Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

> ---
>  drivers/net/virtio_net.c |    6 +++---
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> --- a/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/virtio_net.c
> @@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ static void refill_work(struct work_stru
>  	/* In theory, this can happen: if we don't get any buffers in
>  	 * we will *never* try to fill again. */
>  	if (still_empty)
> -		schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, HZ/2);
> +		queue_delayed_work(system_nrt_wq, &vi->refill, HZ/2);
>  }
>  
>  static int virtnet_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
> @@ -526,7 +526,7 @@ again:
>  
>  	if (vi->num < vi->max / 2) {
>  		if (!try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_ATOMIC))
> -			schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> +			queue_delayed_work(system_nrt_wq, &vi->refill, 0);
>  	}
>  
>  	/* Out of packets? */
> @@ -727,7 +727,7 @@ static int virtnet_open(struct net_devic
>  
>  	/* Make sure we have some buffers: if oom use wq. */
>  	if (!try_fill_recv(vi, GFP_KERNEL))
> -		schedule_delayed_work(&vi->refill, 0);
> +		queue_delayed_work(system_nrt_wq, &vi->refill, 0);
>  
>  	virtnet_napi_enable(vi);
>  	return 0;

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] virtio_net: use non-reentrant workqueue.
  2011-12-29 20:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
@ 2011-12-29 21:44   ` David Miller
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: David Miller @ 2011-12-29 21:44 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: mst; +Cc: rusty, netdev, tj

From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 22:33:14 +0200

> On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 01:55:47PM +1030, Rusty Russell wrote:
>> Michael S. Tsirkin also noticed that we could run the refill work
>> multiple CPUs: if we kick off a refill on one CPU and then on another,
>> they would both manipulate the queue at the same time (they use
>> napi_disable to avoid racing against the receive handler itself).
>> 
>> Tejun points out that this is what the WQ_NON_REENTRANT flag is for,
>> and that there is a convenient system kthread we can use.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au>
> 
> Acked-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>

Applied.

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2011-12-29 21:45 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
     [not found] <87ehvogitg.fsf@rustcorp.com.au>
2011-12-29 10:43 ` [PATCH] virtio_net: use non-reentrant workqueue Rusty Russell
2011-12-29 20:33 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2011-12-29 21:44   ` David Miller

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).