From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer Subject: Re: [Announce] LARTC wiki available Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2011 17:19:20 +0100 Message-ID: <20111229161919.GA2948@hell> References: <4EFB3B2B.7060200@linuxsystems.it> <20111229002717.GB3548@hell> <4EFC34E5.4040202@linuxsystems.it> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: lartc@vger.kernel.org, "netfilter@vger.kernel.org" , Linux Networking Developer Mailing List To: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Niccol=F2?= Belli Return-path: Received: from alternativer.internetendpunkt.de ([88.198.24.89]:48804 "EHLO geheimer.internetendpunkt.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753270Ab1L2QTX (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Dec 2011 11:19:23 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4EFC34E5.4040202@linuxsystems.it> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: * Niccol=F2 Belli | 2011-12-29 10:37:41 [+0100]: >> What about >> >> http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/gro= up > >I saw it, but I didn't like it because unregistered users cannot edit >the wiki and even registered users need an invite. Also, it seems >quite confusing, a traditional wiki is a better solution in my >opinion. Anybody knows that network stack lacks documentation - no doubt. Maybe = a wiki is an adequate concept (beside man pages and in Kernel docs). Everybody= , not restricted to kernel hackers, can edit documentation and add examples. Maybe the netem wiki page at http://www.linuxfoundation.org/collaborate/workgroups/networking/netem is a good example for a good documented subsystem. But I don't like the idea to outhouse the existing wiki. Why two wikis?= What happened with the wiki server if you leave the university? So maybe the= user restriction on linuxfoundation.org should be changed? I strongly sugges= t to keep to documentation as tightly as possible to linuxfoundation (or https://www.wiki.kernel.org/). Hagen