From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo Subject: Re: [PATCH] rds_rdma: don't assume infiniband device is PCI Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 19:21:48 -0200 Message-ID: <20120113212148.GD3904@oc1711230544.ibm.com> References: <20120113181706.GA3904@oc1711230544.ibm.com> <20120113.102518.924916400773191073.davem@davemloft.net> <20120113185258.GB3904@oc1711230544.ibm.com> <20120113.131248.447541680022014759.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: roland@purestorage.com, venkat.x.venkatsubra@oracle.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, dledford@redhat.com, Jes.Sorensen@redhat.com, rds-devel@oss.oracle.com To: David Miller Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120113.131248.447541680022014759.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 01:12:48PM -0800, David Miller wrote: > From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo > Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:52:58 -0200 > > > On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 10:25:18AM -0800, David Miller wrote: > >> From: Thadeu Lima de Souza Cascardo > >> Date: Fri, 13 Jan 2012 16:17:06 -0200 > >> > >> > Is this going through your tree? In patchwork, its state is "Not > >> > Applicable". > >> > >> There was an active RDS maintainer, though I haven't seen patches > >> from that person in a while. > >> > > > > Hi, David. > > > > Venkat is the current RDS maintainer and he has Acked the patch. > > Not according to patchwork. I don't see him reply at all to the > patch posting and give his explicit "Acked-by: " > Venkat, Care to send an Acked-by using a different MUA? Yours sends no In-Reply-To or References header field. David, This is the message Venkat has sent. http://marc.info/?l=linux-netdev&m=132587819932339&w=2 Thanks. Cascardo.