From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
equinox@diac24.net, hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com,
netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC Hanging clean-up of a namespace
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:40:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120119214052.GA12249@hell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1lip32xoi.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>
* Eric W. Biederman | 2012-01-19 13:24:13 [-0800]:
>This thread is a fascinating disconnect from reality all of the way
>around.
>
>- inet_twsk_purge already implements throwing out of timewait sockets
> when a network namespaces is being cleaned up. So the RFC is nonsense.
This is how it is implemented, not how it should be. TIME_WAIT is not the
problem, it is there to keep the stack from sending wrong RST messages. Maybe
the 2*MSL could be fixed by a more accurate 2*RTT.
>- Keeping the timewait sockets at that point we purge them in the code
> can achieve nothing. We don't have any userspace processes or network
> devices associated with the timewait sockets at the point we get rid
> of them. The network namespace exists so long as a userspace process
> can find it. The network namespace exit is asynchronous in it's own
> workqueue so userspace definitely is not blocked.
Another possible solution could be a netns global TIME_WAIT list. But this
is a little bit expensive and out of question - but this _is_ a convenient
solution.
The "5 second reboot" is no argument - it show a discrepance between TCP
requirements and the actual situation.
Hagen
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-01-19 21:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-01-19 11:07 RFC Hanging clean-up of a namespace Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-19 13:31 ` David Lamparter
2012-01-19 17:40 ` David Miller
2012-01-19 19:01 ` David Lamparter
2012-01-19 19:06 ` David Miller
2012-01-19 19:25 ` David Lamparter
2012-01-19 19:31 ` David Miller
2012-01-19 19:53 ` David Lamparter
2012-01-19 20:27 ` David Miller
2012-01-19 21:03 ` David Lamparter
2012-01-19 21:24 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-01-19 21:40 ` David Lamparter
2012-01-19 21:40 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer [this message]
2012-01-19 21:47 ` David Lamparter
2012-01-19 22:10 ` Rick Jones
2012-01-19 22:16 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2012-01-19 22:37 ` David Miller
2012-01-20 6:08 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-20 10:08 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-01-20 11:51 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-20 20:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-01-23 6:07 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-23 6:25 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-01-23 6:58 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-23 7:17 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-01-23 7:30 ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-23 7:55 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-01-19 19:40 ` Hans Schillström
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120119214052.GA12249@hell \
--to=hagen@jauu.net \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
--cc=equinox@diac24.net \
--cc=hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).