netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hagen Paul Pfeifer <hagen@jauu.net>
To: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>,
	equinox@diac24.net, hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: RFC Hanging clean-up of a namespace
Date: Thu, 19 Jan 2012 22:40:53 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120119214052.GA12249@hell> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m1lip32xoi.fsf@fess.ebiederm.org>

* Eric W. Biederman | 2012-01-19 13:24:13 [-0800]:

>This thread is a fascinating disconnect from reality all of the way
>around.
>
>- inet_twsk_purge already implements throwing out of timewait sockets
>  when a network namespaces is being cleaned up.  So the RFC is nonsense.

This is how it is implemented, not how it should be. TIME_WAIT is not the
problem, it is there to keep the stack from sending wrong RST messages. Maybe
the 2*MSL could be fixed by a more accurate 2*RTT.

>- Keeping the timewait sockets at that point we purge them in the code
>  can achieve nothing.  We don't have any userspace processes or network
>  devices associated with the timewait sockets at the point we get rid
>  of them.  The network namespace exists so long as a userspace process
>  can find it.  The network namespace exit is asynchronous in it's own
>  workqueue so userspace definitely is not blocked.

Another possible solution could be a netns global TIME_WAIT list. But this
is a little bit expensive and out of question - but this _is_ a convenient
solution.

The "5 second reboot" is no argument - it show a discrepance between TCP
requirements and the actual situation.

Hagen

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-01-19 21:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-01-19 11:07 RFC Hanging clean-up of a namespace Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-19 13:31 ` David Lamparter
2012-01-19 17:40 ` David Miller
2012-01-19 19:01   ` David Lamparter
2012-01-19 19:06     ` David Miller
2012-01-19 19:25       ` David Lamparter
2012-01-19 19:31         ` David Miller
2012-01-19 19:53           ` David Lamparter
2012-01-19 20:27             ` David Miller
2012-01-19 21:03               ` David Lamparter
2012-01-19 21:24               ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-01-19 21:40                 ` David Lamparter
2012-01-19 21:40                 ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer [this message]
2012-01-19 21:47                   ` David Lamparter
2012-01-19 22:10                     ` Rick Jones
2012-01-19 22:16                     ` Hagen Paul Pfeifer
2012-01-19 22:37                     ` David Miller
2012-01-20  6:08                   ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-20 10:08                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-01-20 11:51                       ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-20 20:55                         ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-01-23  6:07                           ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-23  6:25                             ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-01-23  6:58                               ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-23  7:17                                 ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-01-23  7:30                                   ` Hans Schillstrom
2012-01-23  7:55                                     ` Eric W. Biederman
2012-01-19 19:40   ` Hans Schillström

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120119214052.GA12249@hell \
    --to=hagen@jauu.net \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=ebiederm@xmission.com \
    --cc=equinox@diac24.net \
    --cc=hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).