From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] Implement IP_UNICAST_IF socket option. Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2012 14:39:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20120201.143913.52085939693600862.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1327622268-15602-1-git-send-email-ehoover@mines.edu> <20120201.141232.458020616314562146.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: ehoover@mines.edu Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:33715 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753140Ab2BATjQ (ORCPT ); Wed, 1 Feb 2012 14:39:16 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: "Erich E. Hoover" Date: Wed, 1 Feb 2012 12:32:54 -0700 > On Wed, Feb 1, 2012 at 12:12 PM, David Miller wrote: >> ... >> I see no value in exporting a different API than what other systems >> use, especially if you are adding this interface exactly for providing >> support for WINE applications, so please don't do this thing with >> argument sizes and ip_mreqn. > > I didn't intend to export the API differently, I clearly misread the > article on MSDN. If I revise this patch to require an interface index > is there any chance it will be considered for inclusion? Yes.