From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [net-next 4/7] e1000e: use true/false for bool autoneg_false Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2012 13:34:13 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20120209.133413.349832435589531136.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1328783282-17760-5-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, bruce.w.allan@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com To: David.Laight@ACULAB.COM Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:57100 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754136Ab2BISeV (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Feb 2012 13:34:21 -0500 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: "David Laight" Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2012 13:15:37 -0000 > >> - if (mac->autoneg_failed == 0) { >> - mac->autoneg_failed = 1; >> + if (mac->autoneg_failed == false) { >> + mac->autoneg_failed = true; > > Don't check for equality with true/false. > Booleans also work better if you avoid double-negatives. Agreed.