From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] NET: PHY names vs MDIO bus names regression fixes Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:02:04 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20120213.160204.622185887026096350.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1329132204-27946-1-git-send-email-florian@openwrt.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org To: florian@openwrt.org Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:38116 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754173Ab2BMVCK (ORCPT ); Mon, 13 Feb 2012 16:02:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1329132204-27946-1-git-send-email-florian@openwrt.org> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Florian Fainelli Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:23:19 +0100 > This patch serie aims at fixing the regressions introduced with the > "use an unique MDIO bus name" patchset. Some drivers still formatted > the PHY id to use the old bus name (e.g: "0" or "1") and therefore > the PHY probing logic gets broken because their underlying MDIO bus > name was changed too from "0" to -. > > The offending patches got introduced during 3.3-rc1. Then why the heck are you CC:'ing -stable on these patches? We're still in the 3.3-rcX phase, so there is no other tree in the world these patches should be applied to. In any event, for networking stuff, you shouldn't be adding the stable CC: anyways, I take care of all networking stable submissions myself.