From: Bill Fink <billfink@mindspring.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@google.com>,
alekcejk@googlemail.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: limited network bandwidth with 3.2.x kernels
Date: Wed, 15 Feb 2012 02:52:00 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120215025200.6e6f02a2.billfink@mindspring.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1329286016.2555.41.camel@edumazet-laptop>
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> Le mercredi 15 février 2012 à 01:03 -0500, Neal Cardwell a écrit :
> > There are some potentially interesting differences in sysctl values:
> >
> > > diff -u /tmp/sysctl-a-3.1.txt /tmp/sysctl-a-3.2.txt | grep mem_def
> > -net.core.wmem_default = 114688
> > -net.core.rmem_default = 114688
> > +net.core.wmem_default = 163840
> > +net.core.rmem_default = 163840
> >
> > Can you please try running this as root on the 3.2 kernel and then see
> > what sort of performance you get:
> >
> > sysctl net.core.rmem_default=114688
> >
> > This should make the 3.2 config closer to the 3.1 config. Should be
> > interesting to see if the behavior is more similar when that happens.
> >
> > neal
>
> These changes are normal, since skb truesize now include shared_info.
>
> By the way, these params are not used for tcp streams.
>
> This is why I asked netstat -s values, to check if we had drops because
> of truesize limits.
>
> Its not the case here since skb are not too fat (as some NICS can do,
> using a full PAGE to hold a single 1500 bytes frams)
Would it be useful to check if there was any difference in
TCP parameters between the 3.1 and 3.2 kernels by performing
the following on each:
grep . /sys/module/tcp_*/parameters/*
-Bill
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-02-15 7:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-02-13 20:04 limited network bandwidth with 3.2.x kernels alekcejk
2012-02-13 20:18 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 21:13 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 21:58 ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 22:44 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 22:51 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-13 23:09 ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 23:14 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-13 23:24 ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 23:49 ` alekcejk
2012-02-14 3:06 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-14 3:26 ` alekcejk
2012-02-14 5:55 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-14 14:09 ` alekcejk
2012-02-13 21:16 ` alekcejk
2012-02-21 4:21 ` alekcejk
2012-02-21 16:45 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-21 17:19 ` alekcejk
2012-02-21 17:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-21 18:53 ` alekcejk
2012-02-22 1:26 ` alekcejk
[not found] ` <1920135.kl3o7Tt79c@localhost.localdomain>
[not found] ` <1329228798.4818.0.camel@edumazet-HP-Compaq-6005-Pro-SFF-PC>
2012-02-14 14:28 ` alekcejk
2012-02-14 16:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-14 16:43 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 4:43 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 6:03 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-15 6:06 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 7:52 ` Bill Fink [this message]
2012-02-15 8:00 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 8:18 ` Bill Fink
2012-02-15 8:31 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 13:44 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 13:43 ` Re: Re: Re: Re: " alekcejk
2012-02-15 13:44 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 13:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 13:53 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 14:11 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 14:49 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-15 14:56 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 15:05 ` alekcejk
2012-02-15 15:08 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-15 19:44 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 7:29 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 13:40 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 13:51 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 15:09 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 16:37 ` Ben Hutchings
2012-02-16 17:01 ` David Miller
2012-02-16 17:22 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 17:54 ` alekcejk
2012-02-16 18:19 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 21:49 ` alekcejk
2012-02-16 21:59 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 22:08 ` alekcejk
2012-02-16 22:35 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-17 16:41 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-21 18:41 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-21 19:11 ` David Miller
2012-02-22 5:51 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-22 7:36 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-23 18:39 ` Neal Cardwell
2012-02-23 18:49 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-27 19:39 ` David Miller
2012-02-17 16:55 ` Re: " Neal Cardwell
2012-02-16 18:22 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-02-16 19:44 ` Eric Dumazet
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120215025200.6e6f02a2.billfink@mindspring.com \
--to=billfink@mindspring.com \
--cc=alekcejk@googlemail.com \
--cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
--cc=ncardwell@google.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).