From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Andrew Morton Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: Add some --strict coding style checks Date: Tue, 21 Feb 2012 13:09:17 -0800 Message-ID: <20120221130917.e41491d4.akpm@linux-foundation.org> References: <20120221151435.GA19354@tuxdriver.com> <20120221.144417.1445117001833888214.davem@davemloft.net> <20120221.154053.2103818562080068513.davem@davemloft.net> <1329857959.5143.11.camel@joe2Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , Andy Whitcroft , andrei.emeltchenko.news@gmail.com, linville@tuxdriver.com, linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Perches Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1329857959.5143.11.camel@joe2Laptop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Speaking of which, I just got this: WARNING: %Ld/%Lu are not-standard C, use %lld/%llu #142: FILE: fs/locks.c:2335: + seq_printf(f, "Start-end:\t %Ld-EOF\n\n", fl->fl_start); But %L saves a byte! Why did we do this? Don't you like puppies?