From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/3] mlx4_en: moderate frequency of TX completions Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:47:56 -0500 (EST) Message-ID: <20120223.164756.887751433359593643.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20120223.144437.32389814881687535.davem@davemloft.net> <1330031636.2511.13.camel@bwh-desktop> <1330032380.2511.17.camel@bwh-desktop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: yevgenyp@mellanox.co.il, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: bhutchings@solarflare.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:56695 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752535Ab2BWVsD (ORCPT ); Thu, 23 Feb 2012 16:48:03 -0500 In-Reply-To: <1330032380.2511.17.camel@bwh-desktop> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Ben Hutchings Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 21:26:20 +0000 > And it's pretty obvious the hardware has to also send a completion when > the queue is empty. I hope. Right and we know of several chips that don't.