From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bridge: Adjust min age inc for HZ > 256
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2012 00:09:21 -0500 (EST)
Message-ID: <20120305.000921.1233132850153467742.davem@davemloft.net>
References: <1330625539-10247-1-git-send-email-Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se>
	<20120304210350.629ec5c6@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: Joakim.Tjernlund@transmode.se, netdev@vger.kernel.org
To: shemminger@vyatta.com
Return-path: <netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org>
Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:48630 "EHLO
	shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org
	with ESMTP id S1750868Ab2CEFJZ (ORCPT
	<rfc822;netdev@vger.kernel.org>); Mon, 5 Mar 2012 00:09:25 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20120304210350.629ec5c6@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net>
Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-ID: <netdev.vger.kernel.org>

From: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@vyatta.com>
Date: Sun, 4 Mar 2012 21:03:50 -0800

> I don't understand why this is required.

And I don't understand why it takes nearly a week to review a one line
patch like this.

If you don't say anything I'm going to just apply it after a few days,
which is what I did here already.

Me applying it should never be your trigger to review the patch, yet I
see this happen all the time.  What do you think I was waiting for
these past 5 days, divine intervention?