From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: nick.jones@network-box.com
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] ipv6: perform inetpeer binding at dst creation, with readonly option
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 16:05:28 -0500 (EST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120306.160528.1272258218296495399.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4F56320B.60400@network-box.com>
From: Nick Jones <nick.jones@network-box.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2012 23:49:31 +0800
> A neighbour advertises itself as obsolete and at a later time, the host
> sends solicitations to the neighbours direct address. The NS icmp6
> packets have hoplimit explicitly set to 255.
>
> The neighbour re-advertises itself. All subsequent packets sent to the
> neighbour address will now have hoplimit stuck at 255 because the setup
> of the NS packet wrote 255 to the cached metrics of the inetpeer that
> the neighbour address' ip6_dst was bound to. If the neighbour was a
> router, a RA that attempts to update the hoplimit for the route will
> have no effect because of the way ip6_dst_hoplimit works.
>
> This patch adds an rt6_init_metrics method that is called shortly after
> a call to ip6_dst_alloc, it performs the inetpeer binding at that time.
>
> It allows the caller to indicate whether they want the new ip6_dst
> metrics, and thus the inetpeer metrics, to be writable. icmp6_dst_alloc
> will now no longer permanently alter the peer metrics.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nick Jones <nick.jones@network-box.com>
So we essentially have two views of the same inetpeer.
I would say that the real fix for this is to just use kmalloc'd
metrics for these special icmp6 dsts and leave the rest of the
code alone.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-06 21:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-06 15:49 [PATCH net-next] ipv6: perform inetpeer binding at dst creation, with readonly option Nick Jones
2012-03-06 21:05 ` David Miller [this message]
2012-03-08 16:10 ` Nick Jones
2012-03-08 21:40 ` David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120306.160528.1272258218296495399.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nick.jones@network-box.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).