From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Richard Cochran Subject: Re: [PATCH] net/pch_gbe: supports eg20t ptp clock Date: Tue, 6 Mar 2012 10:25:43 +0100 Message-ID: <20120306092542.GA28585@localhost.localdomain> References: <1330926377-11531-1-git-send-email-tshimizu818@gmail.com> <20120305.005709.1597475617000728984.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: tshimizu818@gmail.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi, mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl, paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, toshiharu-linux@dsn.okisemi.com, jdmason@kudzu.us, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, qi.wang@intel.com, yong.y.wang@intel.com, joel.clark@intel.com, kok.howg.ewe@intel.com To: David Miller Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120305.005709.1597475617000728984.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 12:57:09AM -0500, David Miller wrote: > > So how the heck is this supposed to work? > > You post a patch for the e20tp clock source, you don't CC: netdev. > > Then you post this network driver patch which depends upon that on > and you do CC: netdev. > > You've made it impossible for me to apply them both properly into my > tree so that the dependency goes in. I'm confused. Are you talking about a patch from last August? In any case, if there two patches, then they should of course appear together. Thanks, Richard