From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Johan Hovold Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] bluetooth: hci_ldisc: fix NULL-pointer dereference on tty_close Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 12:57:21 +0100 Message-ID: <20120308115721.GB4497@localhost> References: <1331136120-27075-1-git-send-email-jhovold@gmail.com> <1331136120-27075-2-git-send-email-jhovold@gmail.com> <1331148797.3392.191.camel@aeonflux> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Gustavo F. Padovan" , "David S. Miller" , linux-bluetooth@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable To: Marcel Holtmann Return-path: Received: from mail-lb0-f174.google.com ([209.85.217.174]:41985 "EHLO mail-lb0-f174.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757253Ab2CHL5Z (ORCPT ); Thu, 8 Mar 2012 06:57:25 -0500 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1331148797.3392.191.camel@aeonflux> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Hi Marcel, On Wed, Mar 07, 2012 at 11:33:17AM -0800, Marcel Holtmann wrote: > Hi Johan, > > > Do not close protocol driver until device has been unregistered. > > > > This fixes a race between tty_close and hci_dev_open which can result in > > a NULL-pointer dereference. > > > > The line discipline closes the protocol driver while we may still have > > hci_dev_open sleeping on the req_lock mutex resulting in a NULL-pointer > > dereference when lock is acquired and hci_init_req called. [...] > what kernel version is this against? Our changes in bluetooth-next fixed > some of the destruct handling. This is against the latest rc as it needs to be fixed in 3.3, but I missed a dependency to bluetooth-next as you point out below. > Also hci_unregister_dev should be calling the destruct handler and thus > your change is now accessing hu but it got freed already. You're right, my patch depends on 010666a126fc ("Bluetooth: Make hci-destruct callback optional") and 797fe796c4 ("Bluetooth: uart-ldisc: Fix memory leak and remove destruct cb") from bluetooth-next. But since the latter one fixes a memory leak it should have been marked for stable as well as pushed to Linus for 3.3, right? Thanks, Johan