From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
To: richardcochran@gmail.com
Cc: tshimizu818@gmail.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi, mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl,
paul.gortmaker@windriver.com, jdmason@kudzu.us,
john.stultz@linaro.org, arnd@arndb.de, khc@pm.waw.pl,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
qi.wang@intel.com, yong.y.wang@intel.com, joel.clark@intel.com,
kok.howg.ewe@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RE-SUBMIT] net/pch_gbe: supports eg20t ptp clock
Date: Fri, 09 Mar 2012 13:00:06 -0800 (PST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120309.130006.1423350346805366510.davem@davemloft.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120309173032.GA5730@netboy.at.omicron.at>
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Mar 2012 18:30:32 +0100
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2012 at 09:34:53PM -0500, David Miller wrote:
>>
>> You still haven't submitted this properly.
>>
>> First, you submitted the PCH_GBE driver changes before the EG20T
>> PTP clock driver which it depends upon.
>
> David, both this pair of patches and the second pair apply cleanly to
> both Torvalds mainline and to net-next. So, what are you complaining
> about here? I am still confused.
I'm complaining submitting changes properly, and that has nothing
to do with where or how cleanly the patches apply.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-09 21:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-07 0:21 [PATCH RE-SUBMIT] net/pch_gbe: supports eg20t ptp clock Takahiro Shimizu
2012-03-07 0:21 ` [PATCH RE-SUBMIT] " Takahiro Shimizu
2012-03-07 2:34 ` [PATCH RE-SUBMIT] net/pch_gbe: " David Miller
2012-03-09 17:30 ` Richard Cochran
2012-03-09 21:00 ` David Miller [this message]
2012-03-10 10:42 ` Richard Cochran
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120309.130006.1423350346805366510.davem@davemloft.net \
--to=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=arnd@arndb.de \
--cc=jdmason@kudzu.us \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=joel.clark@intel.com \
--cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
--cc=khc@pm.waw.pl \
--cc=kok.howg.ewe@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lucas.demarchi@profusion.mobi \
--cc=mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=paul.gortmaker@windriver.com \
--cc=qi.wang@intel.com \
--cc=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=tshimizu818@gmail.com \
--cc=yong.y.wang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).