From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stefan Roese Subject: Re: [PATCH] stmmac: Add device-tree support Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 17:23:38 +0100 Message-ID: <201203121723.38411.sr@denx.de> References: <1331561157-3820-1-git-send-email-sr@denx.de> <201203121606.26926.sr@denx.de> <4F5E169D.3070508@st.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Rob Herring , netdev@vger.kernel.org, Viresh Kumar , devicetree-discuss@ozlabs.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: Giuseppe CAVALLARO Return-path: Received: from mo-p05-ob.rzone.de ([81.169.146.181]:56087 "EHLO mo-p05-ob.rzone.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752536Ab2CLQYA (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Mar 2012 12:24:00 -0400 In-Reply-To: <4F5E169D.3070508@st.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Monday 12 March 2012 16:30:37 Giuseppe CAVALLARO wrote: > >>> +Required properties: > >>> +- compatible: Should be "stm,gmac" > >> > >> This is too generic. This should be 1 string per version of h/w. > > > > Viresh, Giuseppe, can you please suggest a proper string for the SPEAr600 > > STMMAC core, including version? > > > >> 'stm' should be 'st' according to vendor-prefixes.txt. > > I'm not familiar with devicetree; maybe we should have: > > "stmicro,mac100" > "stmicro,gmac" > > or: st instead of stmicro if you prefer. > > in fact, stmmac is for mac100 and gmac devices. How about "st,spear600-gmac" for SPEAr600 then? > > Okay. > > > >>> +- reg: Address and length of the register set for the device > >>> +- interrupt-parent: Should be the phandle for the interrupt controller > >>> + that services interrupts for this device > >>> +- interrupts: Should contain the STMMAC interrupts > >>> +- interrupt-names: Should contain the interrupt names "macirq" > >>> + "eth_wake_irq" if this interrupt is supported in the "interrupts" > >>> + property > >> > >> You should be able to tell this from the compatible string and number of > >> interrupts. > > > > Yes. Currently the driver uses platform_get_irq_byname() to register the > > irq's. That's why I added these properties. Is there something wrong with > > using it this way? > > > >>> +- phy-mode: String, operation mode of the PHY interface. > >>> + Supported values are: "mii", "rmii", "gmii", "rgmii". > >>> +- phy-addr: MDIO address of the PHY > >> > >> This is normally probed or the mdio bus is a sub-node of the MAC node. > >> See arch/powerpc/boot/dts/mpc8377_mds.dts for an example. > > > > Okay, I'll rework this. > > > >>> + > >>> +Optional properties: > >>> +- stm,prog-burst-len: Specify the burst length > >>> +- stm,has-gmac: Indicates that the controller supports 1000Mbps > >>> +- stm,has-pmt: Indicates that the controller supports power management > >> > >> I think these should all be encoded by the compatible string. > > and should we have all the other flags e.g. tx_coe etc? > (see stmmac.txt) As Rob suggested, some of these flags/parameters are implicitly defined by the compatible string. If this is not the case, then sure, those flags/parameters need to be provided via the device-tree as well. I just don't need "tx_coe" etc. for my platform (SPEAr600) as far as I know. I suggest to add support for them once they are really needed/used by other platforms. Thanks, Stefan