netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Timo Teras <timo.teras@iki.fi>
To: Francois Romieu <romieu@fr.zoreil.com>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>,
	Ben Hutchings <bhutchings@solarflare.com>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-3.0.18+r8169+ipv4/tcp forwarding = tso/gso weirdness and performance degration
Date: Thu, 15 Mar 2012 08:06:35 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120315080635.1f76512b@vostro> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120314205319.GA28394@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com>

On Wed, 14 Mar 2012 21:53:19 +0100 Francois Romieu
<romieu@fr.zoreil.com> wrote:

> Timo Teras <timo.teras@iki.fi> :
> [...]
> > # ethtool -S eth2
> > NIC statistics:
> >      tx_packets: 2069391193
> >      rx_packets: 3245815642
> >      tx_errors: 0
> >      rx_errors: 645238
> >      rx_missed: 31414
> 
> It does not look like stuff for the higher layers guys.
> 
> Can you tshark -w foobar on the sender side and
> 'while : ; do sleep 1; ethtool -S eth2 >> glop; done' on the receiver
> during a bad wget (a big zero filled file should compress well).

Indeed.

It seems that my earlier test about the "GRO off" effect were mistaken
(I used accidentally proxy, and that gave the illusion that things are
working. Whoops.)

So far I changed the cross-over cable and it didn't help. However,
forcing the NIC to 100mbit/full-duplex mode fixes the rx_errors. It
seems that something bad is happening in the gigabit mode.

# ethtool eth2
Settings for eth2:
	Supported ports: [ TP MII ]
	Supported link modes:   10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 
	                        100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 
	                        1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/Full 
	Supported pause frame use: No
	Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
	Advertised link modes:  100baseT/Full 
	Advertised pause frame use: Symmetric Receive-only
	Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
	Link partner advertised link modes:  10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 
	                                     100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 
	Link partner advertised pause frame use: Symmetric Receive-only
	Link partner advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
	Speed: 100Mb/s
	Duplex: Full
	Port: MII
	PHYAD: 0
	Transceiver: internal
	Auto-negotiation: on
	Supports Wake-on: pumbg
	Wake-on: g
	Current message level: 0x00000033 (51)
			       drv probe ifdown ifup
	Link detected: yes


I wonder if it's using pause frames and that's messing things up. Seems
that I can't turn it off, though.

I can also double check my cables, though it is factory made Cat-5E
cross-over cable; and happens with two different cables.

-Timo

  reply	other threads:[~2012-03-15  6:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-03-14 17:01 linux-3.0.18+r8169+ipv4/tcp forwarding = tso/gso weirdness and performance degration Timo Teras
2012-03-14 17:15 ` Eric Dumazet
2012-03-14 17:29   ` Timo Teras
2012-03-14 18:25     ` Eric Dumazet
2012-03-14 19:29     ` Ben Hutchings
2012-03-14 19:51       ` Timo Teras
2012-03-14 20:12         ` Eric Dumazet
2012-03-14 20:33           ` Timo Teras
2012-03-14 20:52             ` Eric Dumazet
2012-03-14 20:53             ` Francois Romieu
2012-03-15  6:06               ` Timo Teras [this message]
2012-03-15 15:11                 ` Timo Teras
2012-03-15 16:11                   ` Eric Dumazet
2012-03-15 18:47                     ` Timo Teras
2012-03-15 19:11                   ` Francois Romieu
2012-03-16 20:15                     ` Timo Teras
2012-03-17  9:56                       ` Timo Teras
2012-03-17 11:35                         ` Francois Romieu
2012-03-17 22:20                           ` Francois Romieu
2012-03-18  7:00                             ` Timo Teras
2012-03-20 15:31                             ` Timo Teras
2012-03-20 18:20                               ` Francois Romieu
2012-03-14 21:16 ` Francois Romieu

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120315080635.1f76512b@vostro \
    --to=timo.teras@iki.fi \
    --cc=bhutchings@solarflare.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=romieu@fr.zoreil.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).