From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH] isdn: Return -EINTR in gigaset_start() if locking attempts fails. Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 13:58:54 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <20120317.135854.570143927282385505.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1331903413-11426-1-git-send-email-santoshprasadnayak@gmail.com> <20120316.231856.1071253468993560433.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: hjlipp@web.de, tilman@imap.cc, isdn@linux-pingi.de, gigaset307x-common@lists.sourceforge.net, netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-media@vger.kernel.org, kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org To: santoshprasadnayak@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:44504 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756039Ab2CQU7W (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2012 16:59:22 -0400 In-Reply-To: Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: santosh prasad nayak Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 21:26:14 +0530 > Caller is interpreting 0 in opposite way of normal sequence. > Thats why I misunderstood it. The simple fact is that you didn't even look at the code at the call sites when you wrote this patch, and that's the first thing anyone is going to do when reviewing it. Therefore your laziness results in more useless work for other people. I just wanted to point out how selfish and anti-social this kind of behavior is.