From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francois Romieu Subject: Re: linux-3.0.18+r8169+ipv4/tcp forwarding = tso/gso weirdness and performance degration Date: Sat, 17 Mar 2012 23:20:04 +0100 Message-ID: <20120317222004.GA25455@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <20120314215142.655ae607@vostro> <1331755965.6022.55.camel@edumazet-glaptop> <20120314223343.23dc9df3@vostro> <20120314205319.GA28394@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20120315080635.1f76512b@vostro> <20120315171148.0050714d@vostro> <20120315191118.GA19809@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <20120316221557.235f5ffd@vostro> <20120317115625.3fc04de4@vostro> <20120317113501.GC20532@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Dumazet , Ben Hutchings , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Timo Teras Return-path: Received: from violet.fr.zoreil.com ([92.243.8.30]:57320 "EHLO violet" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932487Ab2CQWVz (ORCPT ); Sat, 17 Mar 2012 18:21:55 -0400 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20120317113501.GC20532@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: Francois Romieu : [...] > > Or as easy alternative, enabling the VPD bit in Config1 should allow me > > to read the EEPROM contents using the PCI /sys/.../vpd interface, right? > > In theory, yes. I have not tested it. Imho both access methods will be > useful. I tried vpd and got the eeprom content, duplicated 256 times. The eeprom content is fairly boring: # ethtool -e 8169sc-1 Offset Values ------ ------ 0x0000 29 81 ec 10 67 81 ec 10 67 81 20 40 01 a1 00 e0 0x0010 4c 67 00 01 15 cd c2 f7 ff 80 ff ff ff ff ff 13 0x0020 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0030 ff ff fa d6 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 20 0x0040 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0050 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0060 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff 0x0070 ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff ff -- Ueimor