From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] net: ipv4: Standardize prefixes for message logging Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:03:49 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20120319.170349.957038489849471796.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20120312.170558.584205292599435892.davem@davemloft.net> <1331598952.13200.43.camel@joe2Laptop> <1332190804.6525.12.camel@joe2Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: joe@perches.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <1332190804.6525.12.camel@joe2Laptop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Joe Perches Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 14:00:04 -0700 > On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 17:35 -0700, Joe Perches wrote: >> On Mon, 2012-03-12 at 17:05 -0700, David Miller wrote: >> > From: Joe Perches >> > Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2012 10:03:32 -0700 >> > > Add #define pr_fmt(fmt) as appropriate. >> > > Add "IPv4: ", "TCP: ", and "IPsec: " to appropriate files. >> > > Standardize on "UDPLite: " for appropriate uses. >> > > Some prefixes were previously "UDPLITE: " and "UDP-Lite: ". >> [] >> > Looks good, and applied, >> OK. I'll submit a similar change for net/ipv6 in awhile. > > Would you still take a similar IPv6: prefix > change for net-next or should I wait until > the next release cycle? Sure why not, everyone else is being a complete idiot and submitting all of their shit at the merge window openning. I am backlogged every single time the merge window opens up, why do you people wait until the last possible minute to submit things? Are you all too selfish or too stupid to care? Every single one of you know it's coming, you see several -rc releases go out. The merge window isn't a trigger to "get it done and submitted right now." Instead, it really means "too late."