From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [net-next PATCH v0 0/5] Series short description Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 19:51:47 -0700 Message-ID: <20120319195147.23c26657@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <20120319.183808.976759898435189612.davem@davemloft.net> <20120319155537.79d5802c@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <4F67CED4.4000700@intel.com> <20120319.203541.1126968121556911783.davem@davemloft.net> <4F67F04E.8060800@intel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: David Miller , jhs@mojatatu.com, bhutchings@solarflare.com, roprabhu@cisco.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org, mst@redhat.com, chrisw@redhat.com, gregory.v.rose@intel.com, kvm@vger.kernel.org, sri@us.ibm.com, chealy@imsco-us.com To: John Fastabend Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F67F04E.8060800@intel.com> Sender: kvm-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 19:49:50 -0700 John Fastabend wrote: > On 3/19/2012 5:35 PM, David Miller wrote: > > From: John Fastabend > > Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2012 17:27:00 -0700 > > > >> Dave, its probably fine to push this to 3.5 then. > > > > Fair enough. > > Stephen, please let me know if you see any issues though > because without these we have no way to forward packets > correctly in the embedded switch. So we can't really > use SR-IOV and virtual interfaces together correctly. And > the macvlan device in passthru mode is putting the device > in promiscuous mode which isn't great either. > > .John I am more worried about evaluating ABI compatibility with older utilities.