netdev.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: chetan loke <loke.chetan@gmail.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net,
	jacob.e.keller@intel.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com,
	john.ronciak@intel.com, john.stultz@linaro.org,
	tglx@linutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH net V4 2/2] igb: offer a PTP Hardware Clock instead of the timecompare method
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 18:00:03 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120321170003.GA5533@netboy.at.omicron.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAAsGZS6=UsyiGK=ZOwRuY0CNR7aOFLrwpn-2hXEtQJbWEULciA@mail.gmail.com>

On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:00:59AM -0400, chetan loke wrote:
> Once PHC->gettime goes live(aka exported to user space), we can't
> really control how users will use it in their applications. There
> could be 100+ apps all trying to get real-time from the network to do
> some time-keeping stuff. They might pound the ioctls at high rate. The
> last thing we would want is to self-induce a light weight DOS. What
> Eric Dumazet mentioned in the very first patch set seems like a good
> comment. seqlock or whatever it is we use for jiffies.

Can you please explain how using a seqlock could help here?

Thanks,
Richard

  parent reply	other threads:[~2012-03-21 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <D3F292ADF945FB49B35E96C94C2061B916484EC4@nsmail.netscout.com>
2012-03-15 17:18 ` [PATCH net V4 2/2] igb: offer a PTP Hardware Clock instead of the timecompare method chetan loke
2012-03-16  6:55   ` Richard Cochran
2012-03-21 15:00     ` chetan loke
2012-03-21 16:08       ` Richard Cochran
2012-03-21 17:02         ` chetan loke
2012-03-22  7:00           ` Richard Cochran
2012-03-21 17:06         ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-03-22  7:09           ` Richard Cochran
2012-03-22 21:59             ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-03-23  6:05               ` Richard Cochran
2012-03-21 17:00       ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2012-03-21 17:09         ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-03-21 21:50           ` chetan loke
2012-03-22  6:41             ` Richard Cochran
2012-03-22 23:13               ` chetan loke
2012-03-23  5:59                 ` Richard Cochran
2012-03-23 18:27                 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-03-23 19:39                   ` chetan loke
2012-03-24  6:51                     ` Richard Cochran
2012-03-26 15:07                       ` chetan loke
2012-03-26 15:27                         ` Richard Cochran
2012-03-26 17:11                           ` chetan loke
2012-03-26 18:56                             ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-03-26 19:32                               ` chetan loke
2012-03-26 20:46                                 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-03-27 18:05                                   ` Richard Cochran
2012-03-27 18:29                                     ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-03-27 18:43                                       ` chetan loke
2012-03-27 18:51                                         ` chetan loke
2012-03-27 20:58                                           ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-03-27 21:55                                             ` chetan loke
2012-03-29 23:08                                               ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-03-30 15:17                                                 ` chetan loke
2012-03-27 15:33                             ` Richard Cochran
2012-03-27 18:39                               ` chetan loke
2012-03-26 20:51                       ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-03-27 18:33                         ` Richard Cochran
2012-01-21 16:03 [PATCH net V4 0/2] igb: ptp hardware clock Richard Cochran
2012-01-21 16:03 ` [PATCH net V4 2/2] igb: offer a PTP Hardware Clock instead of the timecompare method Richard Cochran

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20120321170003.GA5533@netboy.at.omicron.at \
    --to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
    --cc=e1000-devel@lists.sourceforge.net \
    --cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
    --cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
    --cc=john.ronciak@intel.com \
    --cc=john.stultz@linaro.org \
    --cc=loke.chetan@gmail.com \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).