From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Greg KH Subject: Re: [PATCH] net: bpf_jit: fix BPF_S_ALU_AND_K compilation Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 08:13:27 -0700 Message-ID: <20120331151327.GA25059@kroah.com> References: <40f4b91c5200771f223966f368095c63.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Eric Dumazet , netdev@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org To: Indan Zupancic Return-path: Received: from out1-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:35090 "EHLO out1-smtp.messagingengine.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1760114Ab2CaPN3 (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:13:29 -0400 Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.nyi.mail.srv.osa (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F2BE20C5D for ; Sat, 31 Mar 2012 11:13:28 -0400 (EDT) Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40f4b91c5200771f223966f368095c63.squirrel@webmail.greenhost.nl> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Sat, Mar 31, 2012 at 08:52:09PM +1100, Indan Zupancic wrote: > Hello, > > Finally, after much searching I found one little bug. > > [PATCH] net: bpf_jit: fix BPF_S_ALU_AND_K compilation > > Small typo resulted in bad code generation for certain > values of K for the BPF_S_ALU_AND_K instruction. > > Signed-off-by: Indan Zupancic > --- > This is not the correct way to submit patches for inclusion in the stable kernel tree. Please read Documentation/stable_kernel_rules.txt for how to do this properly.