From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Oleg Nesterov Subject: Re: ipv6: tunnel: hang when destroying ipv6 tunnel Date: Sat, 31 Mar 2012 23:34:23 +0200 Message-ID: <20120331213423.GA21219@redhat.com> References: <1333227549.2325.4051.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Sasha Levin , davem@davemloft.net, kuznet@ms2.inr.ac.ru, jmorris@namei.org, yoshfuji@linux-ipv6.org, Patrick McHardy , netdev@vger.kernel.org, "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List" , Dave Jones , Tetsuo Handa To: Eric Dumazet Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1333227549.2325.4051.camel@edumazet-glaptop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On 03/31, Eric Dumazet wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 19:51 +0200, Sasha Levin wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > It appears that a hang may occur when destroying an ipv6 tunnel, which > > I've reproduced several times in a KVM vm. kernel version? > > [ 1561.564172] INFO: task kworker/u:2:3140 blocked for more than 120 seconds. And nobody else? It would be nice to know what sysrq-t says, in particular the trace of khelper thread is interesting. > Something is wrong here, call_usermodehelper_exec ( ... UMH_WAIT_EXEC) > should not block forever. Yes, unless it triggers another request_module()... Tetsuo, could you please take a look? Unlikely, but may be this is fixed by your kmod-avoid-deadlock-by-recursive-kmod-call.patch in -mm ? Oleg.