From: Antonio Quartulli <ordex-GaUfNO9RBHfsrOwW+9ziJQ@public.gmane.org>
To: Al Viro <viro-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
Cc: netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org,
b.a.t.m.a.n-ZwoEplunGu2X36UT3dwllkB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] endianness bugs in net/batman-adv/
Date: Sat, 14 Apr 2012 11:34:05 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120414093404.GA5300@ritirata.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20120413194629.GP6589-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3133 bytes --]
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 08:46:29 +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Let's start with net/batman-adv/translation-table.c:send_tt_request().
> Its tt_crc argument gets stored into skb as-is and skb goes on the wire.
> OK, so it's fixed-endian, right?
ok, it's a bug. The tt_crc field must be stored in the skb by using htons().
>
> That sucker comes straight from the (only) caller - tt_update_orig().
> There it gets compared with ->tt_crc of struct orig_node instances. Fine,
> except that just prior to that comparison we assign to ->tt_crc the return
> value of tt_global_crc(). Which is built on crc16_byte() and clearly
> returns a host-endian value. Additionally, orig_node ->tt_crc is getting
> compared to tt_request->tt_data in send_other_tt_response(), which ultimately
> comes from recv_tt_query() where it's flipped from net-endian to host-endian.
>
We want to do every computation using host-endian data. There is no "fixed
endian" anywhere. As I wrote above, we forgot to use htons() before sending the
tt_crc over the wire.
> It gets even funnier - we have 3 structures with ->tt_crc in them;
> one is struct orig_node (see above), another is struct batman_ogv_packet and
> then there's the weirdest one - struct bat_priv. Where ->tt_crc is
> atomic_t, of all things. With exactly two things ever done to it:
> batman_ogm_packet->tt_crc = htons((uint16_t)
> atomic_read(&bat_priv->tt_crc));
> in bat_iv_ogm_schedule() and
> atomic_set(&bat_priv->tt_crc, tt_local_crc(bat_priv));
> in prepare_packet_buffer(). What the hell does that have to do with atomic_t?
Thank you for spotting this. It was defined as atomic_t in the early development
phase of this new tt framework, but, then, I'd say that we forgot to convert it
to uint16_t once atomic_t was not needed anymore.
> At least that one is definitely host-endian all along (tt_local_crc() is
> the same kind of built-on-crc16_byte() thing).
>
> And then there's batman_ogv_packet, where we flip the damn field
> from net-endian to host-endian and back. That's where the argument of
> tt_update_orig() comes from, AFAICS always in host-endian form.
>
> IOW, unless I'm misreading that code we have
> bat_priv ->tt_crc: host-endian, no need to make it atomic_t
I agree.
> orig_node ->tt_crc: host-endian
I agree. As I said before we want to use host-endian everywhere. We just want to
convert the data to net-endian before sending it over the wire (like people
should normally do).
> tt_update_orig()/send_tt_request() tt_crc argument: host-endian
I agree.
> the value put into the packet in send_tt_request(): broken; should be
> net-endian, in reality it's host-endian. Missing htons() at the very
> least.
>
Exactly. This is the bug I was talking about in my first inline response.
All the problems come from a missing htons() before sending the tt_request
packet.
Thank you very much. I'll fix it.
Best regards,
--
Antonio Quartulli
..each of us alone is worth nothing..
Ernesto "Che" Guevara
[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 490 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-04-14 9:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-04-13 19:46 [RFC] endianness bugs in net/batman-adv/ Al Viro
[not found] ` <20120413194629.GP6589-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-14 9:34 ` Antonio Quartulli [this message]
[not found] ` <20120414093404.GA5300-E/2OGukznS5g9hUCZPvPmw@public.gmane.org>
2012-04-14 13:07 ` Antonio Quartulli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120414093404.GA5300@ritirata.org \
--to=ordex-gaufno9rbhfsroww+9zijq@public.gmane.org \
--cc=b.a.t.m.a.n-ZwoEplunGu2X36UT3dwllkB+6BGkLq7r@public.gmane.org \
--cc=netdev-u79uwXL29TY76Z2rM5mHXA@public.gmane.org \
--cc=viro-3bDd1+5oDREiFSDQTTA3OLVCufUGDwFn@public.gmane.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).