From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5][6lowpan] several fixes for 6lowpan Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:35:54 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20120425.203554.1187346578559639487.davem@davemloft.net> References: <1335264671-27127-1-git-send-email-alex.bluesman.smirnov@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-zigbee-devel@lists.sourceforge.net To: alex.bluesman.smirnov@gmail.com Return-path: Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([198.137.202.13]:55250 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932686Ab2DZAgH (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2012 20:36:07 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1335264671-27127-1-git-send-email-alex.bluesman.smirnov@gmail.com> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: From: Alexander Smirnov Date: Tue, 24 Apr 2012 14:51:06 +0400 > the following patch-set contains several fixes/improvements for 6lowpan: > 1. fix: segmentation fault caused by mlme request > 2. impr: move frame allocation code to a separate function > 3. fix: clean up fragments list if module unloaded > 4. impr: duplicate definition of IEEE802154_ALEN > 5. fix: add missing spin_lock_init() > > Could you please review them? You need to not mix bug fixe patches with one which perform cleanups and code refactoring. Submit the pure bug fixes as one set, against the 'net' tree. Then submit the rest as another set, against the 'net-next' tree. Thanks.