From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Stephen Hemminger Subject: Re: [PATCH] unix_diag: use netlink attribute MAX convention Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 13:09:06 -0700 Message-ID: <20120425130906.7a090d22@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> References: <20120425115609.4ef9ece0@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <20120425.150716.1476178549121153876.davem@davemloft.net> <20120425124743.5b4fb8a3@nehalam.linuxnetplumber.net> <20120425.155717.2099319998110521099.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: shanwei88@gmail.com, xemul@parallels.com, netdev@vger.kernel.org To: David Miller Return-path: Received: from mail.vyatta.com ([76.74.103.46]:53750 "EHLO mail.vyatta.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1758345Ab2DYUJL (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Apr 2012 16:09:11 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20120425.155717.2099319998110521099.davem@davemloft.net> Sender: netdev-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:57:17 -0400 (EDT) David Miller wrote: > From: Stephen Hemminger > Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2012 12:47:43 -0700 > > > On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 15:07:16 -0400 (EDT) > > David Miller wrote: > > > >> Either you apply them as soon as possible, or you mark them > >> appropriately as "Changes Requested" or "Deferred" so that the > >> submitter makes appropriate fixes you've asked for, or resubmits when > >> it's more appropriate for the change to go in. > >> > >> "Under Review" doesn't mean, "I'm waiting for a kernel release with > >> the feature". But that's how you use it. > > > > Ok. What is the suggested tag for that. > > As I said above, "Deferred", with a note sent to the submitter to resubmit > the patch at the appropriate time. That doesn't work, not asking original submitter to resubmit. I tried a branch, but git doesn't like branches coming and going on remote repos. Probably better to just have an ephemeral iproute2-next repo on kernel.org.