From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Miller Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] net/at91: at91_ether fixes for 3.4-rc Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 06:12:12 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <20120426.061212.570213998793556907.davem@davemloft.net> References: <4F991210.8060409@atmel.com> <20120426.052006.1832921763623188173.davem@davemloft.net> <4F991E6D.4020303@atmel.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, avictor.za@gmail.com, plagnioj@jcrosoft.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org To: nicolas.ferre@atmel.com Return-path: In-Reply-To: <4F991E6D.4020303@atmel.com> List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: linux-arm-kernel-bounces@lists.infradead.org Errors-To: linux-arm-kernel-bounces+linux-arm-kernel=m.gmane.org@lists.infradead.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org From: Nicolas Ferre Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 12:07:41 +0200 > So, should I repost both of them as patch series? Yes, with a leading "[PATCH 0/N] " posting as I asked.