From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Simon Horman Subject: Re: [v2 PATCH 1/1] ipvs: kernel oops - do_ip_vs_get_ctl Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 18:05:20 +0900 Message-ID: <20120426090520.GA5801@verge.net.au> References: <1335419264-1225-1-git-send-email-hans.schillstrom@ericsson.com> <1335427841.3131.28.camel@t520> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Hans Schillstrom , ja@ssi.bg, wensong@linux-vs.org, rohara@redhat.com, lvs-devel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, netfilter-devel@vger.kernel.org, hans@schillstrom.com To: Jesper Dangaard Brouer Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1335427841.3131.28.camel@t520> Sender: netfilter-devel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org On Thu, Apr 26, 2012 at 10:10:41AM +0200, Jesper Dangaard Brouer wrote: > On Thu, 2012-04-26 at 07:47 +0200, Hans Schillstrom wrote: > > Change order of init so netns init is ready > > when register ioctl and netlink. > > > > Ver2 > > Whitespace fixes and __init added. > > > > Reported-by: "Ryan O'Hara" > > Signed-off-by: Hans Schillstrom > > Looks good, interdiff says you fixed up things, and I have tested it > against the net tree, good work :-) > > Is this a stable tree candidate? Yes, I think so. I now have the following 7 changes in my ipvs tree on kernel.org. The last two are already in Pablo's net tree and I intend to send a pull request for the remaining 5 soon. It is my opinion that all 7 patches are stable tree material. ipvs: kernel oops - do_ip_vs_get_ctl ipvs: take care of return value from protocol init_netns ipvs: null check of net->ipvs in lblc(r) shedulers ipvs: reset ipvs pointer in netns ipvs: add check in ftp for initialized core ipvs: fix crash in ip_vs_control_net_cleanup on unload ipvs: Verify that IP_VS protocol has been registered