From: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@gmail.com>
To: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>,
netdev@vger.kernel.org, gospo@redhat.com, sassmann@redhat.com
Subject: Re: [net-next 06/12] ixgbe: Hardware Timestamping + PTP Hardware Clock (PHC)
Date: Thu, 10 May 2012 16:11:22 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20120510141122.GB3392@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1336632413-19135-7-git-send-email-jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
Mostly, this looks very good. I do have one concern and a nit, though.
On Wed, May 09, 2012 at 11:46:47PM -0700, Jeff Kirsher wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> index 1693ec3..9a83c40 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_main.c
> @@ -789,6 +789,13 @@ static bool ixgbe_clean_tx_irq(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector,
> total_bytes += tx_buffer->bytecount;
> total_packets += tx_buffer->gso_segs;
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_IXGBE_PTP
> + if (unlikely(tx_buffer->tx_flags &
> + IXGBE_TX_FLAGS_TSTAMP))
> + ixgbe_ptp_tx_hwtstamp(q_vector,
> + tx_buffer->skb);
This looks strangely wrapped.
> +
> +#endif
> /* free the skb */
> dev_kfree_skb_any(tx_buffer->skb);
>
...
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000..0b6553e
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ixgbe/ixgbe_ptp.c
...
> +/**
> + * ixgbe_ptp_rx_hwtstamp - utility function which checks for RX time stamp
> + * @q_vector: structure containing interrupt and ring information
> + * @skb: particular skb to send timestamp with
> + *
> + * if the timestamp is valid, we convert it into the timecounter ns
> + * value, then store that result into the shhwtstamps structure which
> + * is passed up the network stack
> + */
> +void ixgbe_ptp_rx_hwtstamp(struct ixgbe_q_vector *q_vector,
> + struct sk_buff *skb)
> +{
> + struct ixgbe_adapter *adapter;
> + struct ixgbe_hw *hw;
> + struct skb_shared_hwtstamps *shhwtstamps;
> + u64 regval = 0, ns;
> + u32 tsyncrxctl;
> + unsigned long flags;
> +
> + /* we cannot process timestamps on a ring without a q_vector */
> + if (!q_vector || !q_vector->adapter)
> + return;
> +
> + adapter = q_vector->adapter;
> + hw = &adapter->hw;
> +
> + tsyncrxctl = IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_TSYNCRXCTL);
> + regval |= (u64)IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_RXSTMPL);
> + regval |= (u64)IXGBE_READ_REG(hw, IXGBE_RXSTMPH) << 32;
> +
> + /*
> + * If this bit is set, then the RX registers contain the time stamp. No
> + * other packet will be time stamped until we read these registers, so
> + * read the registers to make them available again. Because only one
> + * packet can be time stamped at a time, we know that the register
> + * values must belong to this one here and therefore we don't need to
> + * compare any of the additional attributes stored for it.
I suspect that this assumption is wrong. What happens if the time
stamping logic locks a value but the packet is lost because the ring
is full?
BTW, the IGB driver also has this defect.
Thanks,
Richard
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-10 14:11 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-10 6:46 [net-next 00/12][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 01/12] igb: output register's information related to RX/TX queue[4-15] Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 02/12] ixgbe: Exit on error case in VF message processing Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 03/12] ixgbe: Clean up priority based flow control Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 04/12] ixgbe: Set Drop_EN bit when multiple Rx queues are present w/o " Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 05/12] ixgbe: Fix bogus error message Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 06/12] ixgbe: Hardware Timestamping + PTP Hardware Clock (PHC) Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 14:11 ` Richard Cochran [this message]
2012-05-10 21:53 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-05-11 5:15 ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-11 18:05 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-05-11 19:23 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-05-12 5:34 ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-14 17:28 ` Jacob Keller
2012-05-14 22:42 ` Jacob Keller
2012-05-15 5:32 ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-11 19:34 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-05-12 5:24 ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 07/12] ixgbe: Enable timesync clock-out feature for PPS support on X540 Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 14:17 ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-10 21:54 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-05-11 5:36 ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-11 18:09 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-05-10 22:08 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-05-11 5:40 ` Richard Cochran
2012-05-11 18:10 ` Keller, Jacob E
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 08/12] ixgbe: correct disable_rx_buff timeout Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 09/12] ixgbe: add support for get_ts_info Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 10/12] ixgbe: support software timestamping Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 11/12] ixgbe: cleanup the hwmon function calls Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-10 6:46 ` [net-next 12/12] ixgbe: update version number Jeff Kirsher
2012-05-11 3:18 ` [net-next 00/12][pull request] Intel Wired LAN Driver Updates David Miller
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20120510141122.GB3392@localhost.localdomain \
--to=richardcochran@gmail.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=gospo@redhat.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sassmann@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).