From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Francois Romieu Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next] hp100: delete VG/AnyLAN hp100 Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 21:28:08 +0200 Message-ID: <20120518192808.GA19446@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> References: <1337272841-25931-1-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <1337272841-25931-3-git-send-email-paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> <4FB52C99.6010303@windriver.com> <20120517212039.GC27789@windriver.com> <1337292547.8872.20.camel@joe2Laptop> <20120517222843.GA30680@electric-eye.fr.zoreil.com> <1337295024.8872.33.camel@joe2Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Joel Soete , Paul Gortmaker , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, JBottomley@parallels.com, "David S. Miller" , netdev@vger.kernel.org To: Joe Perches Return-path: Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1337295024.8872.33.camel@joe2Laptop> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: netdev.vger.kernel.org Joe Perches : [...] > I saw people using TR adapters with Linux as of 2008/9. > > That doesn't mean it's common or make it desirable to > keep TR in the current kernel tree though. I'll leave token ring PCI drivers where they are for now. > Is VG/AnyLAN different? Your own word: "unused". I see nothing wrong asking users if they still care. If no one cares about the hp100, fine. -- Ueimor